• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 minutes ago

    American here - babies, temples…? Enough of your metric system insanity, I need this in football fields.

    Anyway, we do know Jesus wasn’t poor. The Wedding at Cana was a very upscale event - based on the specific types and amounts of expensive anointing oils mentioned in the text. “A poor carpenter’s son” would have been there waiting tables for some extra money. Being a guest tells us he rubbed shoulders with some high rollers. His father Joseph might have been a top craftsman with wealthy clients.

  • turdburglar@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    i don’t remember from which book, but i have a memory from catholic school of his hair being described in the bible as “wooly”. did i make that up?

    • FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      I googled it because it sounded familiar; [book of revelations (https://www.gotquestions.org/Jesus-hair-like-wool.html) (i.e the bibles “Epilogue”!)

      Since he’s dead and this is a vision, I think they were actually trying to depict him as literally being a sheep in this passage. His hair is not just wooly but white, too.

      Jesus was compared to a lamb so often because jewish tradition had lambs slaughtered on passover, for eating. He is “the sacrificial lamb” - Jesus’s crucifixion was seen as him sacrificing himself on passover, if I understand correctly. I only mention this because it’s one of the interesting elements of the religion that people don’t fully understand the significance of because its actually rooted in the existing Jewish traditions.

  • Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The temple market he overturned tables at isn’t covered and wasn’t then either. No upper limit, bigger than a baby but we can infer smaller than a planetary body to some extent. The temple is technically just the largish building in the middle.

  • j5y7@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    He is whatever you imagine him to be. You just gotta have louder faith than everyone else.

  • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    According to the internet, a grown ass donkey can carry up to around 80kg, and the good book says Jesus was riding one, so we should assume this is somewhat the upper limit for his mass

    • Quantenteilchen@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      So what are his density extremes based on this? (I am too lazy and hungry to do that calculation right now. Besides, just because I know he was “smaller than a temple” does not mean I know the likely size of that temple to get a true volume bound…)

    • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      In the book of Matthew, it says he rode two donkeys.

      Matthew and Luke copy a lot of stuff from Mark, which was written first. The donkey story is there to fulfill prophesy. It was prophesied that the messiah would ride a donkey into Jerusalem. It also said he would be a king and vanquish their enemies and rule in peace and prosperity, but the New Testament authors figured riding a donkey was close enough.

      So Matthew geta to the donkey story and reads the original prophesy. It says “Behold, your king is coming to you, humble, and mounted on a donkey, and on a colt, the foal of a donkey.”

      This is a poetic way of writing about a single donkey, like saying “he drove a car, he drove a red car.”

      But Matthew, frankly, fucked up a lot of stuff that he wrote, and he doesn’t know this, so he changes everything to plural to fit the prophesy.

      So everybody else writes that Jesus had his disciples bring a donkey and they lay their cloaks on it and he sits on it and rides to town. Matthew has them bring two, they lay their cloaks on them and he sits on them and rides to town.

      It’s unclear how he rode two donkeys. Was one donkey on top of the other and Jesus on top of that? Was it jean Claude van-damme style with him doing the splits between them?

      At any rate, if the donkeys spread the load he could have weighed 160kg.

      By the way, these donkeys are stolen. Jesus tells his disciples that there was a house back there that had a donkey (or two), go get it (them) for me.

      • Albbi@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That was a damn fine rabbit hole to go down just to get to the point of setting the upperbound of the Jesus size limit to 160kg.

      • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Was it jean Claude van-damme style with him doing the splits between them?

        Was thinking exact same thing reading this comment, and now I can’t get that thought out of my mind

        • tetris11@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Presumably hollow limbs that he could fit fish and bread into, and at least some kind of capillary network infused with some form of alcohol

      • mefisdo_dot_info@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, everyone here seems to forget magic was involved here. For all we know he could have been 12’ tall and light as a feather, with retractable beard and 5 legs.

      • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        No that was magic. He also applied the water walking buff on one of his friends, who then right-clicked the buff off and found out he can’t swim

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Well then, how can we be sure he didn’t just cast the donkey riding spell?

          • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            I checked the shaman’s spellbook and they don’t have that spell, only Paladins have that

            Edit: to clarify, I believe Jesus was a shaman because he could walk on water, resurrect from death (ankh), and as a carpenter he was probably well capable of crafting totems. There’s also documented cases of him going melee combat (with tables, mostly) and healing others too

            The food trick implies that he had a friendly mage though conjuring food, though he took the credit for himself

            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              13 hours ago

              jesus is famously a warlock, what with the getting his power from a patron deity thing.

              • metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                10 hours ago

                But then he was also descended from said deity, so celestial-bloodline sorcerer would also make sense?

                And through weird extradimensional time shenanigans he is also said deity? I don’t understand it myself, but I’m told it makes sense in 12 dimensions.

                He was also briefly undead, likely a revenant given the unfinished business.

                All of this depends on the edition of the lore you read though. In the beginning he was probably just a warlock multiclassing in cleric, then a supplemental edition has him ascend to demi-god status, which was later ruled actual divinity by a local authority once the franchise changed hands. Later, some of it was retconned and toned down for being too OP in another rulebook, but famously that rulebook wasn’t very well accepted even though a sizeable playerbase still exists.

                There are later editions where the pathway to divinity is laid out and Jesus is one of many gods, but that rulebook is still considered niche despite some disproportionate influence.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Unless they had stronger donkeys back then.

      Could have been a lot of selective breeding for decreased stubbornness sacrificing load capacity as a tradeoff during the last two thousand years.

      They could theoretically have been capable of hauling 500lb behemoths without breaking a sweat but unwilling to follow any comnands 🤷🏻

      Btw grown ass donkey 😁

    • optional@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I think we can be pretty sure that he was no T-Rex though. I’ve never seen someone try, but I’m confident that you can’t crucify them with their short arms.

  • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Rev 1:14-16, New International Version has Jean-Baptiste’s account of Jesus’s appearance:

    14The hair on his head was white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire. 15His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters. 16In his right hand he held seven stars, and coming out of his mouth was a sharp, double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.

    He has white hair. ✅

    • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There would be some geological record if he’d manifestly affected global tides. So, less gravitational mass than the moon, for sure.

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      People are reading that passage wrong anyway. Most Bible scholars agree that just because Jesus fitted into the temple doesn’t mean he would fit into the temple at all times. When he was in his giant mecha form, Jesus had no upper bound on his size.

    • TAG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Well the temple is on Earth, so smaller than the Earth, probably.

    • StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      We can estimate from the remains of structures so establish a theoretical upper-bound. If I had to guess, I’d say he was 7 ft, since as far as I know, 7 is the Hebrew number associated with perfection.

      • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I don’t think they could have constructed saint Peter’s basilica at this time or anything near the size of those archers, there is like a 1500 year difference between the two.

        Side note: I’m not religious, but St Peter’s basilica is probably the most impressive building I’ve ever seen in my life. Someone feel free to recommend competitors.