• Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There would be some geological record if he’d manifestly affected global tides. So, less gravitational mass than the moon, for sure.

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      People are reading that passage wrong anyway. Most Bible scholars agree that just because Jesus fitted into the temple doesn’t mean he would fit into the temple at all times. When he was in his giant mecha form, Jesus had no upper bound on his size.

    • TAG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Well the temple is on Earth, so smaller than the Earth, probably.

    • StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      We can estimate from the remains of structures so establish a theoretical upper-bound. If I had to guess, I’d say he was 7 ft, since as far as I know, 7 is the Hebrew number associated with perfection.

      • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I don’t think they could have constructed saint Peter’s basilica at this time or anything near the size of those archers, there is like a 1500 year difference between the two.

        Side note: I’m not religious, but St Peter’s basilica is probably the most impressive building I’ve ever seen in my life. Someone feel free to recommend competitors.