Not necessarily, but in practice, almost always. There is no other motivation. They don’t want parents to be able to indoctrinate children into the parent’s own culture and instead want the children to be indoctrinated with their own culture. That’s not just racism, it’s a form of cultural genocide. We know a lot about that here in Canada.
The most oppressive hat. Take a pill.
deleted by creator
It’s considered more sophisticated and refined.
It depends. Abandonment has a floor to how bad it’s gonna get. You die. Abuse has no floor, because they keep you alive.
You see a cute stray, I see ten thousand dead birds and a sundered ecological web.
That’s so backwards. Your name is whatever you say your name is. What is written in a government database isn’t your name, it’s an opaque identifier.
Glaciers have been in retreat for millennia. The Great Lakes exist because the massive glacier that recently used to be there was so heavy, it caused a huge depression in the Earth’s crust. All gone. It was never going to stop. We’re just making it happen faster.
I’d also like to add that even if I was advocating for Canada to be annexed or some shit like that, your response would still be unacceptable. You don’t get to abuse people because you don’t respect their opinions. That’s fucked up.
Buddy, you are ALL up in your feels and not in control of yourself. You’re not responding to what I wrote, you’re responding to voices in your head. I was commenting on the quality of your argument, not on the underlying truth of the situation. The point being made is that any position can be justified when you use cliches instead of actual reasoning. For that you have to resort to childish name calling? Clearly you are not being a serious person right now. If you can pull yourself together, you’re welcome to try again, but I have reported your abusive comment.
If you are content to throw around pithy aphorisms in place of rational discussion, consider that an eye for an eye leaves the world blind.
Cats are not social animals. They do not need companionship the way humans and other social animals do. If your cats don’t like each other and you know a good home, consider moving one. It’s a very small way you could put your slave’s needs over your desires.
Rushdie is a badass
She stole that from Prince.
25 years isn’t that long. If that’s all it takes to transition to a static model, I take that deal any day of the week. The longer we predicate everything on growth, the worse transition gets.
To be fair, it’s a cracker of a manual, and you cannot finish the game without being pretty familiar with it.
Disability can even be temporary. A mother who cannot put her child down experiences life with one arm and mobility issues. Accommodating disability helps everyone, as you say.
But also, a surfeit of resources and wealth. We’ve seen global population crashes before and (aside from the mass death that predicated them) I understand that the aftermath was actually quite pleasant.
If our system can’t support even a steady state population, it needs to fail. Constant growth is a ponzi scheme.
Ultimately, so what? What is the problem you are attempting to prevent? Declining population is not per se a problem.
Oh calm down. You’re preventing the wearing of hats.