Scam-Lemmy.me
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
IsaacscatNala@lemmy.ca to cats@lemmy.world · 6 hours ago

what the actual fuq...

lemmy.ca

message-square
38
fedilink
181

what the actual fuq...

lemmy.ca

IsaacscatNala@lemmy.ca to cats@lemmy.world · 6 hours ago
message-square
38
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    43 minutes ago

    What’s wrong? Here’s an inverted image of a cat skeleton illustration. You would expect the back joints to bend towards its fore limbs.

    I guess people are just not used to see cats from this angle?

    an inverted image of a cat skeleton illustration

  • prettybunnys@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

  • Pratai@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    • Pyro@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I hate this post-LLM world

      • blackjam_alex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 hours ago

        https://youtu.be/hzhgprZ9abI

        Timestamp 4:10

        I found it in video form. It’s not proof of anything but that’s the source of the frame.

        • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          looks perfectly normal once the cat moves and you can see how the anatomy works

      • iamthetot@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m not saying this pic is necessarily really, however you should put next to zero stock in these “AI detectors”.

        • Pratai@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          They’ve been close to 100% accurate by my testing

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 hours ago

            how do you test?

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Using Al-driven AI-detectors

            • Pratai@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Send it AI pictures that you know are AI and it is able to determine its AI. Send it photographs that aren’t AI and it determines its not AI.

              How else would you test it?

              • Zorque@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Send it pictures that look like AI but you know aren’t, send it pictures that don’t look like they’re made by AI but you know they are.

                It’s not just yes or no, it’s a wider ranging analysis.

                • ryannathans@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Send it photoshopped images

                • Pratai@piefed.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  43 minutes ago

                  When I send it pictures that look like AI, it says it’s AI. And when I send it pictures I know aren’t AI, it says it isn’t.

                  Your bias is personal it seems. I don’t have these issues.

    • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Unless you use something like synthID verification, stop using these detectors. They are 0% reliable

      • Pratai@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yet they all agree with one another other. Funny how that is. If it’s not AI for one, it’s not for all, and vice versa. They’re accurate enough.

        • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          ah. want me to tell you your horoscope as well, while we’re at it?

          • Pratai@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            43 minutes ago

            Embarrassing.

            • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              39 minutes ago

              at least we agree that you are

              • Pratai@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                25 minutes ago

                Blocked. Go annoy someone else.

                • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 minutes ago

                  your ai slop tools are wrong btw

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Exactly, cats aren’t real they’re just a computer half lucid apeing

  • Bakkoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Do not engage. Top half said cute, bottom half says attack.

  • eurodyne@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Me on any given Saturday night

  • saltnotsugar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Behold human!!!
    “The heck am I beholding?!”
    Just…dude…BEHOLD!

  • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    i can’t make it sense

  • cybervseas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m having fun figuring out how kitty returns to the upright position. I think: raises limbs to normal kitty angle, then twists body to bring all limbs to one side, then manages to put limbs underneath body and push up against the floor.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      kitties have little hidden springs all over. one bloinggggg and they pop right up in nanoseconds.

  • django@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Clearly a player of inverted guard; be careful, she might try to leglock you.

  • 64bithero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Ai ?

    • IsaacscatNala@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      no >:(

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What camera did you use? The face looks so uncanny…

      • Pratai@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          you know those things have an insanely high false-positive rating right? like 70%

          • Pratai@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 hours ago

            They’ve been accurate for me.

            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 hours ago

              cool.

    • 64bithero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      deleted by creator

    • Pratai@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yep. I just ran it through a few searches.

cats@lemmy.world

cat@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Typical internet cats. Videos, pics, memes, and discussion welcome!

Rule 1) Be kind

Rule 2) Follow the lemmy.world rules

other cat communities

midwest.social cats

cats with jobs

birds, some cats

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.29K users / day
  • 3.07K users / week
  • 6.52K users / month
  • 11.8K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 30.1K subscribers
  • 7.47K Posts
  • 46.2K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • skyler@lemmy.world
  • dillis@lemmy.world
  • skyler@lemmy.ml
  • m3t00🌎🇺🇦@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org