IsaacscatNala@lemmy.ca to cats@lemmy.world · 7 hours agowhat the actual fuq...lemmy.caimagemessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1221arrow-down138
arrow-up1183arrow-down1imagewhat the actual fuq...lemmy.caIsaacscatNala@lemmy.ca to cats@lemmy.world · 7 hours agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squareblackjam_alex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·3 hours agohttps://youtu.be/hzhgprZ9abI Timestamp 4:10 I found it in video form. It’s not proof of anything but that’s the source of the frame.
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 hour agolooks perfectly normal once the cat moves and you can see how the anatomy works
minus-squareiamthetot@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·5 hours agoI’m not saying this pic is necessarily really, however you should put next to zero stock in these “AI detectors”.
minus-squarePratai@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·5 hours agoThey’ve been close to 100% accurate by my testing
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 hours agoUsing Al-driven AI-detectors
minus-squarePratai@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·4 hours agoSend it AI pictures that you know are AI and it is able to determine its AI. Send it photographs that aren’t AI and it determines its not AI. How else would you test it?
minus-squareZorque@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·2 hours agoSend it pictures that look like AI but you know aren’t, send it pictures that don’t look like they’re made by AI but you know they are. It’s not just yes or no, it’s a wider ranging analysis.
minus-squarePratai@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 hour agoWhen I send it pictures that look like AI, it says it’s AI. And when I send it pictures I know aren’t AI, it says it isn’t. Your bias is personal it seems. I don’t have these issues.
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·48 minutes agoI hope you can see how that is just confirmation bias and not proof
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 hours agoUnless you use something like synthID verification, stop using these detectors. They are 0% reliable
minus-squarePratai@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 hours agoYet they all agree with one another other. Funny how that is. If it’s not AI for one, it’s not for all, and vice versa. They’re accurate enough.
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 hours agoah. want me to tell you your horoscope as well, while we’re at it?
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 hour agoat least we agree that you are
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·55 minutes agoyour ai slop tools are wrong btw
minus-squarewhotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 hours agoExactly, cats aren’t real they’re just a computer half lucid apeing
I hate this post-LLM world
https://youtu.be/hzhgprZ9abI
Timestamp 4:10
I found it in video form. It’s not proof of anything but that’s the source of the frame.
looks perfectly normal once the cat moves and you can see how the anatomy works
I’m not saying this pic is necessarily really, however you should put next to zero stock in these “AI detectors”.
They’ve been close to 100% accurate by my testing
how do you test?
Using Al-driven AI-detectors
Send it AI pictures that you know are AI and it is able to determine its AI. Send it photographs that aren’t AI and it determines its not AI.
How else would you test it?
Send it pictures that look like AI but you know aren’t, send it pictures that don’t look like they’re made by AI but you know they are.
It’s not just yes or no, it’s a wider ranging analysis.
Send it photoshopped images
When I send it pictures that look like AI, it says it’s AI. And when I send it pictures I know aren’t AI, it says it isn’t.
Your bias is personal it seems. I don’t have these issues.
I hope you can see how that is just confirmation bias and not proof
Unless you use something like synthID verification, stop using these detectors. They are 0% reliable
Yet they all agree with one another other. Funny how that is. If it’s not AI for one, it’s not for all, and vice versa. They’re accurate enough.
ah. want me to tell you your horoscope as well, while we’re at it?
Embarrassing.
at least we agree that you are
Blocked. Go annoy someone else.
your ai slop tools are wrong btw
Exactly, cats aren’t real they’re just a computer half lucid apeing