

Trump throats Putin, to even remotely suggest that this would end positively for Zelensky might as well prove that you’re a shill or bot.
Go back to Reddit.
Trump throats Putin, to even remotely suggest that this would end positively for Zelensky might as well prove that you’re a shill or bot.
Go back to Reddit.
I kinda want more articles about what people are saying. Like I get that Trump did X and we aught to know about it - but what about the people on Truth Social? Is it just a powerful echo chamber or?
Edit: yes, I say this because I feel like vomiting when I think of visiting that place.
No, you have every right (and obligation, actually) to be disillusioned about the United States. This thought, however, verges on conspiratorial delusion.
Replace fascism with… checks notes again… fascism…
What?
“Nigh is the time of Madness and Distain” - The Witcher 3
I think this is a fantastic example of Brandolini’s Law in action. The responses to each other were more or less immediate, as far as examining hours can take you, but then your responses started to take more and more time vs. theirs being within the same hour.
They can spew whatever delusional bullshit they want, while you’re forced to actually examine it and detail the ramifications of such ridiculous behavior. Bravo. I’m sorry you had to take psychic damage for it, but bravo.
Isn’t that the problem though? Pandering by creating overly masculine women doing things that men traditionally do?
Idk, maybe I’m over simplifying it - but I’ve known a decent amount of sexists that love Alien. I don’t think she was overly masculine, nor do I think her role was overly masculine. Idk.
I think it really depends on why the story has a female lead.
I think Alien is a good example, Ripley could have been male and it really wouldn’t have changed the plot that much. If I’m not mistaken Ripley actually was male at one point in the movies writing.
Doesn’t matter that the shift happened, it happened, Sigourney Weaver fucking smashed it out of the park and the rest is history.
If the story is good and happens to have a female lead, I don’t think people are actually against it. The Menu is the first movie to come to mind, I don’t think anyone said anything about the lead in that being female (although being a lead in an ensemble cast with damn near equivalent amounts of screen time is kind of meaningless). I think what people are against is blatant pandering because it usually indicates that the product is poor.
Edit: this is my limited, anecdotally rooted opinion. There are probably a decent amount of people who will just not watch a female lead. I’ve known women who won’t watch something or play a video game without a female lead or the ability to create a female character, so I assume the same has to be true for men.
Have you never seen something get closer to a camera?
Weak bladders beware, with this one trick you will wake up early. Not the way you want.
A bullet
Lucky, my roosters are either total assholes or complete cowards - but they both end up worthless when a fox or coyote show up.
Unfortunately they only hang after they’ve destroyed countless lives.
Well I’m pretty sure @krolden has you on principle considering the kind of person Dotcom is.
That’s nice
These people are under the impression that secondhand smoke is sentient and immediately finds the nearest non-smokers lungs to pollute. I wouldn’t expect logic to get through to them.
I make it a point to not discuss things like this when people aren’t thinking clearly.
When you smoke a cigarette the smoke doesn’t automatically find the nearest non-smokers lungs in order to harm them. The smoke settles, and there are more than enough places far enough away from people to smoke at.
If you’re worried about secondhand smoke harming you in any context outside of smoking indoors - I’m sorry but you just aren’t thinking clearly.
Name a single language that Trump speaks well.