• etuomaala@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    This is the dumbest shit. Like the guardian article says, you don’t need to enrich uranium to make nuclear power. Canada has been doing it for decades using the CANDU system.

    There are exactly two reasons to enrich uranium:

    1. providing starting material for the more efficient U-238 -> Pu reactors, which burn 100% of the uranium instead of less than 1%, or thorium reactors. Both of these require much more pure fuel, just to get going. Probably not this one, because this requires very sophisticated technology that pretty much only France has ever managed to do at scale with Superphénix.

    2. bombs

    • tekato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Either the US does it and can at least keep an eye on the program, or another country helps them and it’s the same situation just worse.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      KSA involvement in 9/11 was purely a a proxy arm of US empire. ie. under full approval of US establishment.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Not that I’m a fan of Saudi Arabia, but they had nothing to do with 9/11. Some of the people who planned and executed 9/11 were from Saudi Arabia, but that’s it.

      • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Omar al-Bayoumi’s primary connection to the Saudi royal family stems from substantial financial stipends routed to him and his wife from Princess Haifa bint Faisal, the wife of Prince Bandar bin Sultan, who was the longtime Saudi Ambassador to the United States. Declassified FBI documents and findings from the “28 pages” of the Joint Inquiry reveal that thousands of dollars in cashier’s checks issued by the Saudi Embassy—tied directly to the Ambassador’s wife—changed hands and were deposited into the bank accounts of al-Bayoumi’s wife. [123]

        Key Royal Connections and Financial Links

        • Prince Bandar bin Sultan: As the prominent Saudi Ambassador to the U.S. and a high-ranking member of the royal family, his embassy oversaw the operations and stipends of numerous Saudi nationals. The FBI confirmed al-Bayoumi received a monthly stipend through entities tied to Saudi authorities during the time he assisted the hijackers. [123]
        • Princess Haifa bint Faisal: The Prince’s wife sent a series of monthly cashier’s checks, ostensibly meant for charitable and medical assistance for another Saudi national’s family, but the FBI determined that some of these funds were redirected into the bank accounts of al-Bayoumi’s wife. [1]
        • Saudi Intelligence Apparatus: Declassified FBI documents confirm that al-Bayoumi was a covert Saudi intelligence agent. In the Saudi governance structure, the intelligence services report directly to senior members of the royal family. [12]
  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Next foreign terrorist attack on the U.S. will involve nuclear material and then Americans will act all surprised when it happens.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Saudi Arabia nationals were responsible for 9/11

        So naturally the USA went off and attacked Iraq and Afghanistan in revenge

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          True, but why would that give hypothetical future 9/11-ists to Saudi Arabian uranium? The Saudi government, being a willing and committed US vassal, had almost certainly has no intention of letting anything like that happen.

          • brandon@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            One real issue is that the Saudi government is really just a bunch of minor princes and royal family members in a trenchcoat.

            So yes, it may be the case that the King and senior officials don’t want to enable the proliferation of nuclear materials, but that doesn’t mean the Saudi government isn’t a leaky seive.

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The Saudi gov was already a “willing and committed US vassal” when 9/11 took place and that obviously didn’t stop it from happening

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Sure, but it didn’t happen using Saudi government anything. My point is: Why the assumption that hypothetical future terrorists would be able to get access to Saudi Arabian nuclear material?

              • Jhex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Because it will now be available to them… you seem to be under the impression that the SA gov will have 100% control of everything as if illegal material does not constantly find its way into black markets

  • Nautalax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Previously the US was demanding that Saudi Arabia normalize relations with Israel before it would support this. Since that’s no longer being held over their head, this could be considered as a hit to Israel and as a win for the Saudi-Turkey-Qatar-Egypt block.

  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Just a bunch of terrorists etching weapon of mass destruction deals. Nothing could possibli go wrong.

  • skvlp@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Why? Build solar farms on a small fraction of the land and the population has energy.

    Is this some crazy logic reaction to cocking it up in Iran?

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      My guess is because they saw what happened to Iran who do not have a nuclear weapon. They saw what happened to them when they don’t have a nuclear weapon. And they saw how the US moved defensive assets to protect Israel while their neighbours turned into missile targets.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is part of keeping KSA tolerant of US war. At the same time, it undermines any international legitimacy of “war was supposedly to stop Iran nonexistant nucllear proliferation risk”. It exposes the resistance to zionazi axis as exlcusive motive. At same time, KSA expresses concerns about how loving Israel led genocide is, and is sitting on part of Greater Israel’s land.

    Earlier this week US also made a deal to expand Iraq oil infrastructure. Expect as devoted follow through as the Iran MOU deal which supposedly ended the war, and gave Iran control over SoH. Although, this is part of the plan for retaining colonial access to GCC while just leaving the war.