• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    After getting an EV myself, the vroom is completely irrelevant IMO, I actually find the silent acceleration way cooler. 😎
    The problem with the new Electric Ferrari is way more that the design is an uninteresting stereotype of an average small sportscar.

    • faltryka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Agreed, there are some really cool ev hypercars out there and Ferrari could have done that and gotten positive responses, but instead they made the most boring looking car ever.

    • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They have used none of Ferrari’s “design language” for this car, it doesn’t look like a Ferrari.

      • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This was actually designed by Johnny Ives’ design studio. I don’t think they got the message that Ferrari was the customer.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I absolutely agree, it could maybe be argued that the new design is elegant, but my immediate impression was just uninteresting.

        • PlantJam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I would have believed this car was a Kia without a second thought if I saw it on the road with that badge. That’s not a compliment for either company, unfortunately.

          • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Looks a lot like the recent Nissan Leaf. Slightly less bulky front and the leak has a solid black area at the front for the lights, but other than that almost the same look to the car.

    • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I enjoy it when I sit in the car, but only to a degree. And I hate it when others keep driving by my window, blasting me with their micro penis sound. Or when they scare my dogs. So if you 100% absolutely need it to be happy, let’s make a compromise and play an artificial sound inside of your own car. Oh, and please do the same with every fucking loud motorcycle.

      And to Ferrari, if you want an outrageously cool car with electric motors, this is how you do it.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JYp9eGC3Cc

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Exactly, it looks somewhat like some of those cheap Japanese sports cars from the late 80’s. Except those were OK for the price and time.

    • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I drive a chevrolet bolt and I can definitely hear the motor when I’m accelerating fast. Honestly I think a loud electric motor sounds way cooler than a gas engine, especially when you think about the fact that the noise is coming out of something the size of a coffee can thats having 150 thousand watts dumped into it.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 minutes ago

        IDK how many HP yours have, ours is pretty modest by EV standards with only 204 HP, and I can’t really say for sure that I can hear the engine.
        But we did buy a car that has very good sound proofing, but we can still hear the tires clearly. Still the quiet of the car makes it feel like a luxury car IMO. 👍 😎

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Difficult to use the same design language with massive batteries. I actually think it looks okay. For me the issue is the 700k price tag.

      • everett@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You’re misunderstanding the term. Design language is subtle aesthetic cues, usually not functional, that remind you of other things they’ve made in the past. To suggest that the batteries dictate stuff like the shape of headlights doesn’t make sense.

        • theherk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Fair. I meant proportions/silhouette, not details like lights. I just mistakenly thought those were also part of design.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Those batteries are a massive advantage for the design, they are put at the bottom like all other electric cars, and help keep the weigh center very low.
        Engines and cooling also allow for much greater flexibility in design. But for some reason they decided to not use that greater design freedom to make an actual cool design, but more like if Tesla model 3 had a sports version with some body tuning.

        The 700k price tag is not a problem for me, 500k or 700k doesn’t make any difference to me, I can’t afford either.
        My price range is more like 60k, and then I buy it used for half of that. 🤣 🤣 🤣
        Still I like new groundbreaking designs, which we have seen sometimes from Ferrari, but this is not one of them IMO.
        This looks more like a way cheaper car, that could actually be in my price range.

        Maybe it looks better in real life, but my experience is the opposite.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          batteries and inverters definitely take up more volume than an ice drivetrain. the advantage is that they can be put in more places than the mechanical linkages.

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I’m pretty sure an ICE takes up more space, there’s a lot more components to it. There’s some very slim EV super cars. And yeah, way more flexibility with an EV system.

            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 hours ago

              i’ve got a phev and lemme tell ya, those batteries are like three times the size (and weight) of the rest of the drivetrain combined, including fuel tank.

              the bmw i3 rex is a pretty extreme example because it has a motorcycle engine, but they managed to cram the engine, inverter, gearbox and fuel tank into the space under the floor of the trunk, between the rear wheels, while the battery pack consists basically the bottom decimeter of the entire car. and that 9 liter tank doubles its range.

              meanwhile the original chevy volt, a fwd car with an 1.6l i4, opted to keep the transmission tunnel and space where a rear axle would go to stuff them with batteries. really compromises the internal space, sacrifices a middle rear seat, and gives a whopping… 45km of electric range.

        • theherk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          My point is simply that electric vs combustion power distribution and volume / mass differences make it, I assume, difficult to maintain the same design language.

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Not at all, there’s loads of fully electric super cars that look just how you would expect, sleeker even. This was a deliberate design decision from Ferrari.

            • theherk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I seem to be unclear I guess. But to me there is a difference between, “can’t use the same design language” and “can’t look sleek”.

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      After getting an EV myself, the vroom is completely irrelevant IMO, I actually find the silent acceleration way cooler. 😎

      How many Ferrari’s/Lamborghini/Supercars/Hypercars have you owned before?

      I also prefer the faster take off at the lights but lets not pretend we’re the target market for Ferrari’s.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I think the principle is exactly the same, actually I think it’s even more cool in a super car. Because your acceleration is insane, but there is still almost no noise.
        One of my neighbors have a pretty fast EV like zero to a hundred in less than 5 seconds. When he gives that car full pedal, it is absolutely awesome.
        IMO a roaring ICE car is so outdated. For a more normal ICE car, it’s outright embarrassing, all that noise for nothing!

        I know rich people tend to be narcissistic, so they may like the attention the noise makes, but generally they don’t like to be involuntary laughing stocks when they play with their expansive toys.

        PS: Our car is pretty average for an EV, but still better than most ICE cars.

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I love how we are on Lemmy, the poorest, rich people hating, communism wanting, most autistic place on the internet talking about what rich people want

          For a more normal ICE car, it’s outright embarrassing, all that noise for nothing!

          Yes that’s right, however they’re not driving a normal ICE, they’re driving a ferrari or lamborghini, the ones with millions of views for people just to hear the sound:

          https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=lamborghini+engine+sound

          4 Minutes of V12 Aventador SV Raw Audio [4K]

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKkvlYi6JC0

          2 million views 🤣

          I know rich people tend to be narcissistic, so they may like the attention the noise makes

          Yes

          but generally they don’t like to be involuntary laughing stocks

          Nobody is laughing at a V12 Aventador or Ferrari F40, this is lemmy autism

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 minutes ago

            Nobody is laughing at a V12 Aventador or Ferrari F40, this is lemmy autism

            Maybe not yet, but in a few years those old ICE cars will seem very outdated, and an EV at a tenth the price will beat it on performance.
            They will only have value as pretty veterans.

  • erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I genuinely think Ferrari deliberately designed a boring looking EV so they can say “See, our customers don’t want EV’s, let’s never do one again.”

    • everett@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This wasn’t designed to appeal to their current customers. Apparently some people like bland EVs and Ferrari want some of that money.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I love how conspiracy theorists always view companies as “perfect” so that even their failures are reclassified as having been done on purpose.

  • Thorry@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    People who have loud cars and care about their cars being loud are some of the saddest people in existence. The only purpose is to shout at others about what an inconsiderate asshole they are. And to make them feel better about being such a sad small peened individual.

    Be it old shitty cars with after market pipes, giant trucks designed to be as obnoxious as possible or “sports” cars only driven by dickheads who can’t drive for shit. I fucking hate them all.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Of course. If you can’t be loud and obnoxious, you can’t compensate for the fact you have a tiny penis.

    Which I wish they’d quit because they’re giving the rest of us with tiny penises a bad name.

  • ikt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    True, EV’s are about things like value for money, quietness, reliability, lack of maintenance, all things expensive flashy cars detest and have no need for

    It’s like making an economical artwork or cheap watch for a super rich person, what’s the point?

      • ikt@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I mean it has 8 cars sold, thanks for confirming what I said?

        • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          All the really awesome supercars are limited runs that aren’t even built until they are ordered. It’s almost about having a thing no one has. I showed you an electric one that flatly scoffed at your assertions and somehow you confabulated it into confirmation bias. You’ve lost the plot.

    • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      lack of maintenance? I don’t see why it would be the case or why it would need less maintenance than a gas(thermal?) cars

      • MurrayL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes, EVs come with a lot less maintenance and running costs. You’ll have to excuse the Facebook-quality image, but this does neatly sum up the main differences:

      • PlantJam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Oil changes, spark plugs, coolant, transmission fluid, and belts are all things I’ve had to maintain for my partner’s car in the past few years that my EV doesn’t need.

      • unpossum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 hours ago

        No oil changes at the very least. There are also around a zillion moving parts in a gas engine, most of which can wear.

      • stepintomydojo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        For the routine stuff: no engine oil to replace, no engine air filter, regenerative braking means you barely use the real brakes. Electric engines are also much simpler so there’s just less to go wrong and need fixing.

      • ikt@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You are not sure why EV’s need less maintenance? I don’t quite understand what you’re asking sorry

  • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    As a Dutchmen, that’s funny. The political party that has been ruling the country for the past 20 years, is very pro-car. We jokingly call them “the vroom vroom party”

  • kboos1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    It just feels wrong, like Ferrari is about being race car purests that also make race cars for the average driver. I know they’ve evolved/changed over years, but this feels wrong, like they went too far. Atleast Audi’s electric car still looks like a Audi. The price tag is insane for what you’re getting.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    For passionate enthusiasts, Ferraris are not merely cars but works of art…the sound of the engine revving evokes a sensation comparable to listening to the music of Giuseppe Verdi or Giacomo Puccini.

    “I agree with him – the horse needs to be removed,” said Barone, adding that his main gripe was its lack of sound. “How can you have a Ferrari without any vroom?”

    I suppose that someone could make a device that polls OBD-II for the current RPM and feeds more synthetic ICE engine sound into the sound system.

    EDIT: Hell, if you’re freed from the constraints of an actual ICE engine, there’s probably some sort of sound that’s more psychologically-optimized to make the guy happy than whatever an actual engine puts out.