Whenever i talk to people about privacy, specifically my friends when i tell them why i switched to Signal and stopped using WhatsApp, i’m always met with people saying that i’m just making no sense and “why would you care so much if you have nothing to hide? I don’t care that meta sees that stuff” and some people are just so stubborn to understand that they might even settle on the “what would a billion dollar company want from me specifically?”. It makes me mad how people refuse to even consider alternatives and open their mind a bit. What do you think?

  • waterwasamistake@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They don’t think they have anything to hide because they think of it as “evil activity”

    Reframe it, like sure you are not doing anything bad but these companies don’t care about criminal or evil behaviour. For them you are like livestock you only serve one purpose: making them money, there are no morals involved. They would sell your data to absolutely anyone for any reason! YOU can’t think of anything bad they could do with your data because YOU are not evil but THEY absolutely are. If an evil person wants your data you shouldn’t give it to them because they WILL find a way to use it against us, its a law of nature just like gravity.

  • yxc999@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “So why do you wear clothes or don’t share your credit card details online?”

  • Psiczar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    …for now.

    What happens if they outlaw being gay, trans, communist, Jewish, Muslim, autistic…

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Meta are harvesting your friends data that you have, contacts, birthdays, addresses etc. Using these platforms means that you are probably sharing friends data without their consent just because you don’t care about your own.

    Anyway that’s how I would put it to them.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    They should go to bathroom with doors open from now. Comfort of privacy is meaningless if they got nothing to hide, right?

  • DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Everyone has something to hide. That’s why I’m not posting my online banking password on Facebook or letting anyone install cameras in my toilet.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I do have something to hide. I wear clothes, because I don’t want everybody to see my naked body. I keep my debit card hidden in my wallet, my keys to my car and house hidden in my pockets, my passwords are hidden in my password manager, my phone’s unlock code is a secret, my SSN is hidden on a card in a secure place in my house, which I also lock up securely. I close the stall door when I use the bathroom, I don’t walk around with my medical records taped to my back, I don’t tell people all the invasive dirty or violent thoughts that randomly pop into my head, and I don’t keep my car’s title in the front seat, nor my bank account and routing numbers written on my arm.

    And I would wager most other people are the same. All of those are completely legitimate things people have to hide, good reasons to keep them secret and locked away. It has nothing to do with being a criminal, or a sick pervert, or a domestic terrorist, or any of the other bullshit fake “explanations” for why people would value their privacy.

    And all that doesn’t even touch issues like systemic corporate or state oppression, data exploitation, or labor repression. It doesn’t touch things like fascist governments coming to power and deciding that certain opinions or expressions of speech are “subversive” and must be banned. How easily “nothing to hide” can become “domestic terrorism” when certain groups come into power.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    A few points:

    • I have nothing to hide,” means you’ve accepted the premise that the burden of innocence is on you. That you are guilty until proven innocent. There are a couple millenia of jurisprudence, saying ‘innocent until proven guilty’ should be the default. The US 5th, 6th, and 14th amendments get close, but they don’t just come out and say it.

    • If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him.” This has been attributed to a few people from Cardinal Richelieu to Voltaire. But the crux is, anyone can make someone appear guilty. Doesn’t matter if you’re innocent. The burden of proof has to be on the accuser, otherwise it’s down to chaos, and tyrrany of the powerful and the mob.

    • Personal privacy by default is one of those fundamental rights that gives us control of a lot of things around us. From freely walking down the street, to our shopping habits, license-plate-readers, location-tracking, who we associate with, and our healthcare.

    • Imagine if the rules were changed so any time anyone wanted to use our data, including transactions, web and mobile interactions, credit-card, banking, voting, healthcare, whatever… they had to get explicit, single-use permission. How much weight would be lifted from everyone’s shoulder. It means you, the individual are in charge.

    • There’s academic data on the psychological effects of surveillance. It has actual effect on one’s behavior and mental health: https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2024/1/niae039/7920510

    • At this point, there are too many privacy leaks. The only reasonable solution is to flip it all on its head. EVERYTHING is private, unless there is a legitimate reason to pierce that veil, and the burden is on those wanting the data.

    It’ll have financial impacts on many business models. Yes, and? Do better.

    • B0rax@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      These are benign, ask them medical stuff, ask about which porn site they visit

  • mesa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Theres a quote something along the lines of

    “I have nothing to hide; I simply don’t trust someone else’s version of justice." When they want to look though my things.

    Just because what you do in your home city is right and legal, doesnt mean it is when you travel, when other governments look at you, when other organizations target you. Nothing to hide just means the collective “they” have more on you specifically. Abortions are a perfect example. Get an abortion in a state that supports it, congrats your tried for murder in a state that doesnt. It doesnt matter that you had it in another place.

    Also whats legal now is not garenteed to be legal in the future. Your benign photo op 20 years ago can get you in big trouble. Or just shunned (gay marriage in some places).

    So yeah, its in your best interest to be annon.

    • cosmos8188@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yep, that is a perfect response. Different jurisdictions have different rules and ethics; having your pants down vs being anon is the difference between easily becoming a criminal upon your arrival and them just knowing the stuff they need to know.