Whenever i talk to people about privacy, specifically my friends when i tell them why i switched to Signal and stopped using WhatsApp, i’m always met with people saying that i’m just making no sense and “why would you care so much if you have nothing to hide? I don’t care that meta sees that stuff” and some people are just so stubborn to understand that they might even settle on the “what would a billion dollar company want from me specifically?”. It makes me mad how people refuse to even consider alternatives and open their mind a bit. What do you think?

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    do you shit with the door open , let me. take a few pics of you doing that

    hand over your phone and let me take a look.

  • blunket@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 minutes ago

    I tell them privacy is a human right, that I don’t need to come up with justifications for why I don’t want to be exploited, and that you’re only conditioned not to care.

    If they don’t see my point then I say OK then.

  • dropdrip@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Shift the conversation towards autonomy, dignity and self-respect.

    The user’s interaction with the-billion-dollar-company’s software is unpaid labour, which is why they profit and the user suffers. They suffer from having their data stolen; they suffer the expenses fostered on to them; they pay for the computers that spy on them; they pay for the electricity to run the spyware; they pay for the data-subscriptions that facilitate the theft of their data. They cover all the expenses of a billion-dollar-company and are deprived of any profit. They do not even garner a wage.

    If one wishes to move towards the point of “my data is worthless” point out the company’s profits or even its speculative valuations. Clearly it’s not worthless. The products that are derived from their exploitation lead to even greater profits for those companies. “A.I.” is a looting of the collective commons. A privatization of humanity’s interaction with computers.

    Do they like being exploited? Do they like their batteries draining faster, because their mobile-computer is running software to spy on them? Do they like running out of data because their mobile-computer is forcefully downloading ads and spyware-updates? Do they like ads? Do they like being interrupted by the highest bidder? Do they like annoying notifications that are just ads? Do they like this shitty experience? Are they complete docile slaves? They are less than wage-slaves for they do not even garner a wage! Have some self-respect and dignity!

      • munsking@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        why?

        everyone shits, everyone knows everyone shits, every one knows what the person in the dedicated shitting room is doing

        yet we all close the door

  • take6056@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The big perspective shift for me, is not that I feel obliged to privacy in public. It’s when the institution observing is so big and centralised that it becomes a power issue. I don’t care if you (the people) see all that I do in public, I have nothing to hide. I do care when your agenda is to see everything and gain power from it.

    • me some time ago
    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      That is a good response. The problem is though they are also collecting data when we are in private. Look at what LG and I grantee you other smart TVs are doing.

  • RavenofDespair@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “I have nothing to share” It’s healthy to want privacy and to say I don’t want to share.