• khánh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    9 hours ago
    1. Rape, regardless of gender, is wrong.
    2. This charity implies rape against women is not wrong.
  • KelvarCherry [They/Them]@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    16 hours ago

    So I looked up the video mentioned in the article. This just sounds like someone who is insane and/or trying to garner attention from religious hysteria. Even after publication, the video mentioned in the article has 397 views and only 7 likes, so it doesn’t seem like anyone really knows who these people are.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It can also be helpful to realize, doomer headlines like this one about nothing-assholes are common on opposite political spectrums too. There are probably some liberally minded feminists who have given horrific takes like “We should just round up every white man born in a red state, and dump them all in a landfill, with no trials.” And as stupid and evil as that is, some news site has probably quoted them to make manosphere centers feel even angrier towards “evil feminists”.

      • KelvarCherry [They/Them]@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yep. This is just one of those aspects of the internet era. I’m certain people publicly said far worse than this in every nation, and they were shunned and their words never made it into a printed article. I know far worse claims that have been published on YouTube and also never got an article about them.

        Now there is the aspect that this is an organization registered as a charity. I can’t speak for the UK, but in the USA, it’s very easy to form a registered charity organization if you are willing to bind yourself to the limitations of such. It’s not something that a government department head signs off on, or a parliamentary body votes on. It’s usually an accounting operation and a rubber stamp.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Was looking for any kind of context that would somehow make it even slightly less-outrageous than the headline indicated.

    It was worse.

  • eleijeep@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The Mountain of Fire and Miracles Daniel Centre Church

    With a name like that, you know they’re fucking nuts.

    • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I’d be surprised if they said something sensible. Found this plan they have on the article:

      “In Jesus name, Amen!” Like it’s some form of magic words such as “abracadabra”

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Your majesty, as head of the Church of England, perhaps you could engage in a bit less blasphemy.

          • wibble@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Not racist, but not a fan of any organised religion, as most of them are pretty much money grabbing scams. I was just providing additional context as to provenance - could have been from anywhere and would have had the same response from me. Question becomes: would you have replied the same if I had said it was French?

            • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              not a fan of any organised religion, as most of them are pretty much money grabbing scams.

              Bit of a strawman here. Generally, most churches aren’t and donate excess money to charity, or possess a historical building which needs to be maintained. My parish didn’t even break even for the past three years and had to lay off a few workers. You only hear about the money grabbing scams because you aren’t in this world, and that’s the news that gets out. “Church raises money for foodbank” isn’t really headline news versus this headline.

              To answer your other question: people tend to look down on African and Asian cultures thinking that they know better than their “savage” ways. In reality, Nigerians tend to just have a different cultural attitude surrounding homosexuality, and this comment was likely something stupid that originated from said clash of cultures. We can’t really say definitively that there are superior cultures, as that goes into racism.

    • ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Dudette’s hard rive, let’s not misgender here. I hear they like that.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The Catholic Church has an institutional issue with protecting priests that they should not be protecting, but the actual rhetoric that the church puts out is usually fairly reasonable. At least, as reasonable as can be expected from any religious organization.

  • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Was worried it was something actually prominent until I saw the name

    The Mountain of Fire and Miracles Daniel Centre Church

    Ah, so it’s moreso a church, but a charity because basically every church functions as a charity.

    Also of course… The name… Definitely hyper charismatic…

  • Melobol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I have not read anything on the link but it sounds like:
    “Go and rape girls as God intended!”

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Deuteronomy 21:10–14:

      When the Lord your God gives you victory in battle and you take prisoners, you may see among them a beautiful woman that you like and want to marry. Take her to your home, where she will shave her head, cut her fingernails, and change her clothes. She is to stay in your home and mourn for her parents for a month; after that, you may marry her. Later, if you no longer want her, you are to let her go free. Since you forced her to have intercourse with you, you cannot treat her as a slave and sell her.