“This war has nothing to do with NATO. It’s not NATO’s war,” Stefan Kornelius, a spokesperson for German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, told reporters in Berlin on Monday. “NATO is a defensive alliance, an alliance for the defense of its territory,” he added.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    48 minutes ago

    I like how Trump’s response to this is a petulant “well we don’t need you anyway, so there!”

    Europe needs to seriously up it’s arms manufacturing though.

  • Fluke@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The response from everyone else should be, “Why would we join a war that’s already been won?”

    Give him his own bloviating bullshit back, served up nice and cold.

    • ptu@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think Boris Pistorius was on point:

      “What does Trump expect from a handful of European frigates that the powerful US navy cannot do?”

      • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Once their ships show up, the Navy can dip and leave the mess to someone else. He can just move on to the next country on his list

  • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    285
    ·
    1 day ago

    “I would also like to remind you that the U.S. and Israel did not consult us before the war, and that Washington explicitly stated at the start of the war that European assistance was neither necessary nor desired,” Kornelius said.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    “but…but…usually when I fuck things up someone sorts it out for me. Why won’t you fix my massive fuck up?”

  • somethingDotExe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    168
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Good answer. Fuck Benjamin and Donald Ducks war. They don’t even know why they did it. NATO is not for undocumented wars.

    • redsand@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Ah. You don’t know about the Mossad CIA operation that started in the 80s and is still running today. You see Epstein and Maxwell gathered blackmail on the most rich in powerful people in the world. Israel is now using that blackmail trove and intelligence gathered from years of selling governments software to expand Israel into “Greater Israel”.

      Did you also miss Ghislaine being invite on the 9/11 shadow council?

    • ClownStatue@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      1 day ago

      In fairness, they know exactly why they did it:

      For The Idiot: Israel needs our help to stop the 40-something-year-old “imminent” threat of an Iranian nuclear bomb (that was supposedly already stopped earlier last year when we “thoroughly destroyed” thir enrichment labs."

      For Bibi, it’s an opportunity to realize Israel’s version of manifest destiny, and to kill people he doesn’t like. Remember how everyone was all, “Boy I hope W doesn’t go nuclear on the middle east” after 9/11? 10/7 has had the same effect on Bibi, except he was predisposed for the merciless violence. He’s never seen these adversaries as “people.” W rarely thought about them at all.

      • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yes, Serbia should have been allowed to genocide more Muslim Bosnians and Albanians. Also Ghadaffi should have been allowed to butcher his population.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Serbia should have been allowed to genocide more Muslim Bosnians and Albanians.

          The NATO intervention killed and displaced more civilians than the Bosnian genocide.

          The Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic had shown his ruthlessness earlier in Bosnia, and now, facing armed attack from Kosovo nationalists, attacked Kosovo, killing perhaps 2,000 people and causing several hundred thousand to become refugees.

          An international gathering in Rambouillet, France, was supposed to try to solve the problem diplomatically. But it presented terms to Yugoslavia that seemed certain to be rejected: NATO control of all of Kosovo, and NATO military occupation of the rest of Yugoslavia. On March 23, 1999, the Serbian National Assembly responded with a counterproposal, rejecting NATO occupation and calling for negotiations leading “toward the reaching of a political agreement on a wide-ranging autonomy for Kosovo. . . . ” The Serbian proposal was ignored, and was not reported in the major newspapers of the United States

          The following day, NATO forces (meaning mostly U.S. forces) began the bombing of Yugoslavia. Presumably, the bombing was to stop the “ethnic cleansing” of Kosovo, that is, the forcing of Albanians out of the province by death or intimidation. But after two weeks of bombing, the New York Times reported (April 5, 1999) that “more than 350,000 have left Kosovo since March 24.” Two months later, with the bombing still going on, the figure had risen to over 800,000. The bombing of Yugoslavia, including the capital city of Belgrade, apparently intended to unseat Milosevic, led to an untold number of civilian casualties.

          From the People’s History of the United States, Chapter 24

          Also Ghadaffi should have been allowed to butcher his population.

          Again, the French airforce and subsequent NATO occupation has killed an order of magnitude more in the last decade than Ghadaffi managed in his entire time in office.

          • LittleBorat3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Orders of magnitude means to the power of 10, you know that right 😂 It’s between 2000 and 5000

            Since when do we care about the aggressors in a conflict?

            “But but NATO, the west…” 💩

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              😂 It’s between 2000 and 5000

              The displaced are between 200,000 and 800,000.

              Since when do we care about the aggressors in a conflict?

              When the aggressor is Russian or Chinese.

              • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                50 minutes ago

                200k-800k still isn’t an order of magnitude difference. Just a random person reading your folks comments learning about stuff here, no ill intent meant.

      • somethingDotExe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There is a huge difference though. No terror attacks on USA, they already said they “nuked them back to zero” with the other operation. They couldn’t define what the end-goal is for operation fury.

        They don’t even agree on why they do this internally. And now they want other states to join in on a war happened because of Trumps small dick. I say fuck no. Let him have the consequences of this retarded administration for once. Let him dig his own grave.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              23 hours ago

              The United States is absolutely part of NATO.

              And Israel functions as a forward operating base, from which European military powers can control the Suez and the Eastern Mediterranean. It’s fundamental to the Western allied control of North Africa and the Middle East, even before you get into its function as a money laundering outfit and testing bed for military technology and policing strategy.

              European leadership has a closer relationship with Israeli military than Turkish military, as a point of comparison.

  • Jumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    For now, I’d dare a bet on Merz getting back to sucking corpo cock

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    But not out of principle … our ships just don’t go that far without breaking down!

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 day ago

        It is a bit of a meme in germany that our military equipment suffers from a lack of maintenance. Also there were a bunch of cases of new weapons systems just failing catastrophically or having huge security issues.

        • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          While true, Germany also has quite strict rules on rating equipment to not be ready. A broken heating or turning indicator on an IFV means it counts as non operational.

          For ships there’s a rule of thumb. One is operational and on a mission, one is being refueled and restocked, one is being refit, maintained, or upgraded. So you need three units to always have one available. Germany has six submarines, meaning two are always available for active operations.

          For planes you have to do hours of maintenance for every minute in the air.

          The Bundeswehr used to lack funds and personnel, now it lacks mostly qualified personnel.

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          My country is a bit towards the south and nobody really knows how our ships still manage to float.

          We have ships where the entire navigation suite has been replaced with a commercial GPS.

          The guns are fired… Every now and then. Sparingly. We still have ammunition from the 70’s in stock. Some times we even manage to misplace equipment.

          Yet somehow we’re considered as the reliable ally, although a bit… wierd.

          • OwOarchist@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            We have ships where the entire navigation suite has been replaced with a commercial GPS.

            Honestly, that’ll do just fine in 90% of cases.

            Only issues are:

            • What do you do if some country has maliciously turned off or disabled the GPS satellites?

            • The commercial GPS unit probably isn’t very EMP-resistant, so it might quickly be disabled if EMPs start going off all over the place … as would happen in a nuclear war.

            But as long as you’re not fighting anybody capable of turning the entire GPS system off and the war hasn’t gone nuclear, it should probably be fine.

            • qyron@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Sincerely? I’d expect to see astrolabes or sextants being pulled from storage.

              • OwOarchist@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Most naval ships actually do carry these old school navigation devices (as well as paper charts) and train on how to use them, just for this purpose. Just in case something disables the electronic navigation.

      • _edge@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        “Bedingt abwehrfähig” is the bureacratic term the government uses to explain that the German military, in particular the equipment, is broken beyond any hope of repair.

      • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Germany sold some submarines to Greece that were leaning over on one side out the factory

  • Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In the words of Knorkator

    Geh aus dem Weg, du Arschgesicht

    Eh mann, du stinkst nach Klo

    Gib lieber auf, das schaffst du nicht

    Und nun zurück in den Zoo

  • Decq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Are we going have that brain-dead ‘freedom’ fries bullshit again? Is this really going to be a repeat of 2003 Iraq? Seeing the limitless supply of brain rot in the US, probably we will.

    • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Even if there’s a full scale invasion of Iran, a repeat of the aftermath of Irak is unlikely. Irak was much more of an artificial country with the major divisions between Kurds, Shia, and Sunni. While Iran also has a bunch of large minorities, it’s more cohesive overall.

    • Jessvj93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s gonna be a lot of foods: freedom fries, freedom burger, freedom sauvignon blanc.