• Rimu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    ‘Successful’ in the very narrow sense that it would be legal to do so. But not successful in actually changing anyone’s politics or the material conditions that give rise to the AfD.

    • nightlily@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Fascists are not permitted a place in democracy as they are anti-democratic. It’s a simple principle that is part of what the German constitution is founded on. Letting them continue while the complex topics they propose simplistic fascist solutions for are addressed, is not an option.

    • homoludens@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      No one thinks it will suddenly change the poltical views of all their voters. The AfD will no longer sit in every TV show spouting their bullshit. They will not get millions and millions of public money. And they will not become our government. That’s not a narrow success - that would be huge.

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      the material conditions that give rise to the AfD

      This here. Thatcherism, Schröderism, Reaganism - libertarianism, austerity narratives & politics, “lobbyism” aka pro-billionaire politics aka taking legal bribes - they all helped advance far-right populism to the mainstream.

      Plus most other (not even necessarily right-wing) parties helping them along by pointing the finger in the wrong direction: immigrants.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This is what I was getting at in my comment. There’s got to be an alternative that addresses those material conditions to durably prevent a right resurgence.

    • nomad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Well, it would probably splinter them into a few new parties as their extreme wing would need to be split off to avoid the same thing repeating with the next party.

      This milder form would still be popular and the backlash could catapult them to power. But they might be in power soon anyways.

      Best case they will get temporarily weakened and the Germans have time to learn from the American deserter and maybe the rise of the far right won’t be en vougue that much.

      • birne@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        They couldn’t splinter into new parties. Successor parties would be banned as well by this decision.

        • nomad@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I guess you would be able to ban some central people from holding political office for a few years. But to can’t can every member from politics forever.

          • BlindPenguin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            49 minutes ago

            The AfD is pretty much the glue that is currently holding all the opposing far-right factions together. The moment they’re gone, there will be a lot of infighting.