• jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sounds like there’s a big market out there for dominatrixes who will step on your nuts while forcing you to explain why white nationalism is a bad thing.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I considered doing that for a living on a regular basis at 3am while doing 4 people’s worth of engineering homework for 12+ continuous hours. The pros are the hourly pay is great, the actual billable labor is easy if you’re good at verbal domination (I have a knack for it to a degree that makes it hilarious I’m exclusively a sub). The cons are that there’s a ton of instability, the work is dangerous, most of the hours aren’t billable, and it doesn’t age with you as a career.

      Like tbh if the work fell into my lap I’d do it, but I’m never spending time advertising sex work.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I feel these people don’t get good role models growing up, and I wish them the best for any type of personal growth

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Step 1: 4chan peeps into being sexually humiliated built a chat bot to do just that.

      Step 2: Chatbots, even the ‘uncensored’ ones, tend to be very progressive regarding social views due to the nature of their training.

      Step 3: Racists on 4chan being humiliated by their chatbot Dom are getting called out on their racism by their sexbot and forced to denounce their neo-Nazi schtick.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s not old. I’m 29 and only understand this because I’m weird.

        So forcefem is a kink that’s weird because it falls into two general categories of people interested: people who don’t want to take the responsibility associated with acknowledging that they’re trans, and people who get off on the degradation of being made feminine. I’m sure there are others but as a trans woman involved in her local BDSM scene those really are the main two. The former sometimes have real shit takes as folks living in self loathing repression are wont to do, and the latter can have some real shit takes because they see femininity as a means by which one can be degraded which is a shit take all on its own.

        These people need to read some Feinberg, Serrano, and probably could use to watch some contrapoints. Also to touch grass. Touch a lot of grass actually.

    • Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean, statistically most of the timelines you can be in are the ones the time travelers have mucked up right proper innit.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      So about that…

      Back in 2019 well before the AI stuff started happening, I started looking into whether or not our history had the kind of Easter Egg that’s often put into the history in virtual worlds where some dismissed religious figure was all like “your free will is just buttons being pressed” or shit.

      And well, it kind of totally exists and is sitting in plain sight but no one seems to have connected it to modern developments yet.

      The Gospel of Thomas (“good news of the twin”) was dug up right when we turned on the first Turing complete computer (a computer capable of simulating another computer) and is all like “the world to come has already happened but you don’t know it” and “you’re in a copy of the universe based on the images that came before you.”

      The only group recorded following it was talking about quantized matter and how there’s an original world that’s infinitely divisible and that the ability to detect an indivisible point making up your body is only possible in the spiritual copy of the physical original (there’s a lot of interesting stuff re: sim theory and quanta vs continuous relativity). They claimed the creator of this copy universe was brought forth in light by an original humanity that’s now dead and we’re in their images as the children of the light based creator.

      It proceeded to get more and more eerie as since 2019 we suddenly now have AI, there’s billion dollar companies trying to move AI literally into light, there’s public radio specials about people digitally resurrecting their loved ones using AI from the literal images the dead person left behind, and the chief alignment figure at the leading AI company was talking in an interview about the alignment goal of getting AI to think of humanity as its children.

      What was pretty implausible in 2019 in just five years is suddenly way more plausible than I thought I’d see in my lifetime, and certainly more than I expected in less than half a decade.

      So while I’m not quite sure time travel is messing with events, maybe we’re seeing some AI generated confabulations or a back propagated variation around how the early 21st century actually played out?

      Alternatively, sometimes truth really is stranger than fiction.

      • 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I do genuinely believe there’s probably multiple versions of me. I hope I’m one of the more interesting ones.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I hope I’m one of the less interesting ones. I know how weird I already am so let’s see how weird I can get! Let’s fucking goooooooo

        • kromem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Well, given there’s relativity built into macro scales and we’ve now found there’s relative facts in quantized scales, it’s a safe bet to say there’s probably no objective measure of how interesting you are or aren’t.

          The more correct statement is that you are only interesting or not relative to a given perspective. So what I hope for you is that you are one of the more interesting versions of yourself to yourself.

        • kromem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Anything specifically? There’s like 15 different things that could be cited in the summary above.