Meh, you want to dive into the Holodomor - there were even larger amounts of famine deaths in other SSRs, so depends what you’re calling “murdered”. Whereas the Nazi extermination campaign in Ukraine was purposeful murder.
you can’t be bothered trying to refute what I posted
That you equate different things and therefore decide that you magically are in the right?
Wow, amazing that.
Meanwhile your war criminals are running around free. Donald Rumsfeld died in his bed, Georgie is painting soldiers. How many dead from their war?
So I guess neither the Germans in the 1940s were in any position to criticize the Soviets over Holodomor, nor the Russians in the 1930s were in any position to criticize Ukraine.
Yes, I think you spend lots of time doing that.
I guess you aren’t going to answer the question.
I guess it’s because you don’t have a good answer.
I already have. See above.
So I guess we (including you and me) all shut up until the countries we’re living in are perfect or near-perfect.
Where have the Democrats said they’re going to stop the war in Iran?
I’m honestly asking - the only stuff I’ve seen is the same nonsense they tried in 2004 of “well, the war should be fought better”, ignoring that the war itself is literally a war crime.
That said, in the past 50 years, things seem to simmer down when they’re in power;
though they tend to have some foul-ups:
Carter: Iran loses the Shah and gains theocracy
Obama: the failed Arab Spring and rise of Islamic State, Russia invades and occupies Crimea
Biden: Fall of Kabul; Russia tries to take out Ukraine after, IIRC, trying to assure us that Russia wouldn’t
Your cynicism is warranted: I have it too.
However, if they get in power, Trump will spend more of his time getting ready for impeachment, and they’ll control the purse strings (or more of them at least).
Great - so Chuck Schumer can do nothing, but when Trump implodes the Democrats are there to take the blame.
They serve only one purpose currently - keeping the left from having any political power. There’s a reason they hysterically demand you vote blue no matter who - it’s not because it works (the past 3 decades show that). It’s because without that, they’d be out of jobs, and an actual opposition party would be required.
Meh, you want to dive into the Holodomor - there were even larger amounts of famine deaths in other SSRs, so depends what you’re calling “murdered”. Whereas the Nazi extermination campaign in Ukraine was purposeful murder.
That you equate different things and therefore decide that you magically are in the right?
Wow, amazing that.
Meanwhile your war criminals are running around free. Donald Rumsfeld died in his bed, Georgie is painting soldiers. How many dead from their war?
Yes, I think you spend lots of time doing that.
Which ones?
Were their percentages higher?
premeditated killing.
They’re indefensible too.
Who I opposed at the time, as did many Americans.
I guess you aren’t going to answer the question.
I guess it’s because you don’t have a good answer.
20% isn’t many. I know, because I was getting tear gassed on the streets.
Meanwhile, the rest of you are . . . . what? Going along with your war criminals showing up for hugs.
I already have. See above.
Kudos to you for being out on the streets.
20% x >280 million people x >60% adults = 33.6 million
33.6 million is many.
Nope: I haven’t hugged any war criminals, nor have many Americans.
https://lemmy.world/post/51348178/25740217
So I guess we (including you and me) all shut up until the countries we’re living in are perfect or near-perfect.
No, but you need to arrest George Bush
If half of the eligible voters in the US, perhaps 30%, did what I did and not voted for him, he wouldn’t have become President.
I’m hoping that the GOP loses both Houses in 45 days: such could save lives in Iran.
Where have the Democrats said they’re going to stop the war in Iran?
I’m honestly asking - the only stuff I’ve seen is the same nonsense they tried in 2004 of “well, the war should be fought better”, ignoring that the war itself is literally a war crime.
Who said that I’d vote for Democrats?
That said, in the past 50 years, things seem to simmer down when they’re in power;
though they tend to have some foul-ups:
Carter: Iran loses the Shah and gains theocracy
Obama: the failed Arab Spring and rise of Islamic State, Russia invades and occupies Crimea
Biden: Fall of Kabul; Russia tries to take out Ukraine after, IIRC, trying to assure us that Russia wouldn’t
Your cynicism is warranted: I have it too.
However, if they get in power, Trump will spend more of his time getting ready for impeachment, and they’ll control the purse strings (or more of them at least).
Great - so Chuck Schumer can do nothing, but when Trump implodes the Democrats are there to take the blame.
They serve only one purpose currently - keeping the left from having any political power. There’s a reason they hysterically demand you vote blue no matter who - it’s not because it works (the past 3 decades show that). It’s because without that, they’d be out of jobs, and an actual opposition party would be required.