Ukraine struck Russia’s largest oil refinery, located in the city of Omsk, on Monday, marking what its forces say was its furthest-ever drone attack in the war.

The Omsk facility, which processes about 21 million tons of oil a year, is in Western Siberia and about 1,700 miles from Ukrainian territory — roughly the distance between Los Angeles and Houston.

  • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    We need some research into how effective drone strikes against refineries are to stop climate change. Are they a net gain in carbon emissions, considering the cost of manufacture and the prevented emissions?

    • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Gotta make it worse.

      There’s the emissions from while it’s on fire plus some of the chemicals in it are worse after being burned like that then in regular emissions. Or become other environmental issues on their own once released/burned.

      Then the emissions from building a new one.

      It’s so much better to just shut it down because no one needs it than blow them up

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Then the emissions from building a new one.

        In Russia’s case, depending on how things go, that many not apply all that much.

        If things go far enough it might lead to Ukraine striking construction sites of oil refineries. Still not great, but much less worse than an actual running refinery.

      • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        In many cases it’s cheaper to replace it with green alternatives. The refineries have competition from windmills, solar plants, etc. It’s not a given that new refineries will fill the gap in the market that destroyed refineries leave.

        I do expect the destruction of refineries to be more positive for the climate than if they had continued producing. Especially if you factor in the demand for reliable supply and strategic availability of energy.

      • Photonic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Perhaps, but you can’t tell me Russia can build them faster than Ukraine can destroy them. And in the meantime it means millions of fewer barrels worth of greenhouse gas emissions.

      • nodiratime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Raise the price enough, and the sold amount will drop. Also, people/industry will begin to look for alternatives.