• Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Audacity is fine but its operations are destructive. I’ve been trying to learn Ardour, but it’s a completely different beast…

    • Nyadia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I don’t think OP’s link mentions it but iirc one of the major changes in Audacity 4.0 is supposed to be non-destructive editing. At least that’s what I think I remember hearing like a year or more ago.

          • Balinares@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I’ll venture, it’s a natural if misdirected immune reaction from people who are all too aware they are being tracked ceaselessly and relentlessly, all day, everyday, not to their benefit. So sure, this one piece of software swears its own tracking is just for debugging purposes… But why risk it?

          • wildflower@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            It only became opt-in when people found out.

            And it’s not the only problem I have with Audacity, this is from an article in slashgear

            "…For example, it says that it collects data necessary for law enforcement but doesn’t specify what kind of data is collected.

            There are also questions regarding the storage of data, which is located in servers in the USA, Russia, and the European Economic Area. IP addresses, for example, are stored in an identifiable way for a day before being hashed and then stored in servers for a year. The new policy also disallows people under the age of 13 from using the software, which, as FOSS Post points out, is a violation of the GPL license that Audacity uses."

            • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              26 minutes ago

              It only became opt-in when people found out.

              source? this is an open-source respository and everything i’ve found contradicts that

              the privacy policy thing was a different thing that was definitely a strike in my eyes, but keep in mind that they reverted that too pretty soon after controversy, claimed it was overzealous lawyering, and it’s been four years since without any further incidents.

        • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          technically it was never shipped and only planned to be enabled in testing builds, and no code ever touched anything outside of audacity on the computer except maybe hardware and dependency details though i’d have to check again for those

          edit: besides audacity stuff it only collected the audacity sqlite3 engine and OS version

    • warmaster@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, mee too. However, there wouldn’t be any Tenacity without Audacity. Besides, Tenacity looks quite far from upstream commits. Doesn’t paint a bright future for the fork. I wish more devs offered their help.

    • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      tenacity development looks somewhat moribund and lacks so many of audacity’s added features and fixes like pasting audio. tenacity’s release porting audacity’s added realtime effects, beats and measures view, and opus support has only been present in an alpha released eight months ago.

  • embed_me@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Been looking forward to it. I know there’s been some buyout but I am feeling optimistic about its future after watching the video made by one of the guys working on it

    • rolandtb303@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      imo i always saw it as an advanced multitrack tape editor style program. idk what update it was, but it was after the buyout where the accuracy of the change speed effect got worse, especially for longer clips (like an hour or 2) where it would just desync entirely. last time i checked they have it on the backend of priorities. tells everything you need to know.

    • warmaster@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Tantacrul ? That guy is a freaking genius. Not only he has done one of the (if not THE) best UX/UI redesigns in the history of FOSS apps. Plus his videos are amazingoy entertaining and informative. Highly recommended.