• Balinares@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’ll venture, it’s a natural if misdirected immune reaction from people who are all too aware they are being tracked ceaselessly and relentlessly, all day, everyday, not to their benefit. So sure, this one piece of software swears its own tracking is just for debugging purposes… But why risk it?

      • wildflower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It only became opt-in when people found out.

        And it’s not the only problem I have with Audacity, this is from an article in slashgear

        "…For example, it says that it collects data necessary for law enforcement but doesn’t specify what kind of data is collected.

        There are also questions regarding the storage of data, which is located in servers in the USA, Russia, and the European Economic Area. IP addresses, for example, are stored in an identifiable way for a day before being hashed and then stored in servers for a year. The new policy also disallows people under the age of 13 from using the software, which, as FOSS Post points out, is a violation of the GPL license that Audacity uses."

        • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It only became opt-in when people found out.

          source? this is an open-source respository and everything i’ve found contradicts that

          the privacy policy thing was a different thing that was definitely a strike in my eyes, but keep in mind that they reverted that too pretty soon after controversy, claimed it was overzealous lawyering, and it’s been four years since without any further incidents.