• Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    14 hours ago

    You severely underestimate the cost of jewelry. And every cost also multiplies by 400% if you put the word “wedding” in front of it.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      And every cost also multiplies by 400% if you put the word “wedding” in front of it.

      In some cases, you can get around that by just not mentioning the whole ‘wedding’ thing.

      And the ring is one of those cases. Just go to the jewelry store, pick one out, and never mention what it’s for. No reason for any price surcharges – a ring is a ring.


      In other cases, though, you really shouldn’t take such shortcuts. That is, if you’re particular about how you want your wedding to go.

      Take the florist for example. For a regular (regular price) order, if you’ve ordered 100 yellow roses for the table settings, but they’re out of yellow roses, they’ll just substitute in 100 white roses instead and call it a day.

      But if you’re particular about ‘your special day’ being perfect and you must have the yellow roses, that’s when the florist needs to know that it’s for a wedding, specifically. And no matter what happens, they’ll do their damnedest to make sure you get the yellow roses you ordered, no substitutions. And that extra mile of effort is what the 400% price surcharge is for.

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        In other cases, though, you really shouldn’t take such shortcuts. That is, if you’re particular about how you want your wedding to go.

        Photographers is the classic example of where you don’t want to cut corners. Even if you cheap out on rings, you can always buy different rings later on. You only get one day to get the photos you want.

    • Pickleideas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I can never tell when someone is just arguing for the thrill of it or if they’re genuine…

      As someone who’s had five dogs and three cats + been married, divorced, and remarried pets cost more just in terms of money. I bought real wedding bands & engagement rings from a proper jeweler for about $1,500 USD per ring. On the other hand I spent between $1500-3000 in vet bills alone for almost every pet I’ve adopted just in the first year; not to mention the toys, food, etc that comes along.

      I suspect you’re gonna say “oh, well some people spend tens of thousands on wedding bands” which is true, but those are also the types of people who spend five-figures on purebred pets and doesn’t apply to the average experiece.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Wow, either your pets have been extremely unlucky, or you live somewhere VERY expensive. Considering those are dollars, I can guess it’s a probably at least a bit of the second.

        My Dutch vet has a “kitten package” which is 550 euros for spay/neuter, first year of (three rounds of?) vaccines and one seperate checkup. I probably spend something like 500 euros on food/grit per cat. Maybe a bit less, it’s cheaper if you have two. That doesn’t include complications of course, or food/toys.

        On the other hand, my wedding ring doesn’t exist because neither of us like rings, so it’s never going to beat that.