U.S. Vice President JD Vance said on April 14 that he is proud of Washington cutting off funding to Ukraine amid Russian aggression, listing it among the Trump administration’s top achievements.

Speaking at a Turning Point USA event in Athens, Georgia, Vance recalled being confronted by a Ukrainian-American over his calls to halt funding for Ukraine.

“And this person got really agitated at me because I was saying we should stop funding the Ukraine war,” Vance said.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Knowing the Ukraine gave up its nukes in exchange for permanent protection from the US, I can understand the “agitation”. I’d be pissed.

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Quavering and faultering on this is what told the world the USA was done being a responsible adult citizen.

      • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Or, you know, openly breaking international law from 1999 on. Which Putin has cited as a precedent for his own illegal war in Ukraine.

    • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      in exchange for permanent protection from the US

      The Budapest Memorandum did not contain such a security guarantee.

        • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          While it did not spell out permanent protection

          If a treaty does not spell out permanent protection, then it does not give permanent protection. That is not how treaties work. It is not a “valid interpretation” to pretend a treaty gives guarantees that it does not specify.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            The guarantee is a permanent protection from their actions, not permanent protection from others action or a requirement for assistance. You are either purposely being obtuse here or just disingenuous.

            My guess is you are a Russian apologist.

            • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 hours ago

              So when you wrote “permanent protection from the US”, you meant that the US would so to say “protect Ukraine from the US”? Not that the US would protect Ukraine from e.g. Russia? That was a very unclear formulation!

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Yes, that was the agreement that Russia, UK, and the US agreed to. That they would not as a country infringe on Ukraine’s sovereignty.