Ukraine said it took a Russian position using just drones and ground robots.

Zelenskyy said it was a wartime first, and no Ukrainian infantry was involved.

He said robots have done over 22,000 missions in three months, keeping many soldiers from harm.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      The thing I fear is that this just becomes a ridiculously futile war of resource attrition. It all comes down to who has more metals and chips and armaments to keep throwing at the other’s pools of the same until one gives up. What a waste…

      …But then again, writing this, I realize that’s almost already how they treat human soldiers so…what will change, I wonder?

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Until the drones start getting used on civilians. Which is absolutely going to happen and soon.

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Possible. It does seem like drones fighting drones should mean less human casualties, which has both a humanitarian side and an escalation risk side.

      Then again a lot of people have thought their weapons would make war less deadly, and been very wrong, including the case of WWI-era artillery.

      • untorquer@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        No one will give a shit about robots dying. The drones will either be attempting to war crime civillians or intercept said war crime robots.

        And drone intercept rates arent even close to that not being scary.

        • treadful@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah, destroying inanimate robots isn’t really going to get your enemy to capitulate. Like shooting Iran’s missiles out of the sky isn’t going to change their plan.

          People need to die in warfare for it to matter. Economic and infrastructure targets are really only useful in reaching that goal of killing.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They “accidentally” told the drones/robots to attack the schools and hospitals. “We would never do that on purpose”

        “Well why were the terrorists using school children as human shields!”

        I doubt it will ever stop

        • festus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          This, but also if you aren’t putting your soldiers at risk then war becomes more palatable (and thus more likely). For example, I doubt Trump would have attacked Iran if he had been quoted 1000+ American causalties in the first week.

    • leoj@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      might lead to faster extinction via other methods tho…

      Would be super interested to see the camera feed from all the drones involved.