Ukraine said it took a Russian position using just drones and ground robots.

Zelenskyy said it was a wartime first, and no Ukrainian infantry was involved.

He said robots have done over 22,000 missions in three months, keeping many soldiers from harm.

  • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Possible. It does seem like drones fighting drones should mean less human casualties, which has both a humanitarian side and an escalation risk side.

    Then again a lot of people have thought their weapons would make war less deadly, and been very wrong, including the case of WWI-era artillery.

    • untorquer@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      No one will give a shit about robots dying. The drones will either be attempting to war crime civillians or intercept said war crime robots.

      And drone intercept rates arent even close to that not being scary.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah, destroying inanimate robots isn’t really going to get your enemy to capitulate. Like shooting Iran’s missiles out of the sky isn’t going to change their plan.

        People need to die in warfare for it to matter. Economic and infrastructure targets are really only useful in reaching that goal of killing.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They “accidentally” told the drones/robots to attack the schools and hospitals. “We would never do that on purpose”

      “Well why were the terrorists using school children as human shields!”

      I doubt it will ever stop

      • festus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        This, but also if you aren’t putting your soldiers at risk then war becomes more palatable (and thus more likely). For example, I doubt Trump would have attacked Iran if he had been quoted 1000+ American causalties in the first week.