U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the United States has ‘serious concerns’ about the announced result of Venezuela’s hotly contested presidential election that authorities say was won by incumbent Nicolas Maduro.

Speaking in Tokyo on Monday shortly after the announcement was made, Blinken said the U.S. was concerned that the result reflected neither the will nor the votes of the Venezuelan people. He called for election officials to publish the full results transparently and immediately and said the U.S. and the international community would respond accordingly.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    755 months ago

    ITT: people that think Maduro’s government isn’t a corrupt clown show.

    You guys do know the US state department isn’t always lying, right? If Maduro had such a strong mandate why would poll watchers get turned away?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      435 months ago

      Yes Maduro is a corrupt dictator but the only reason why the state department is saying that is because it goes against Us interest. He couldn’t give a damn about venezuelans people. If it was a pro west dictator he wouldn’t say that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -45 months ago

        I think it’s more like if the US wants people to believe they didn’t try to rig elections in South America they should stop rigging elections and launching coups when that doesn’t work in South America.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -71
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It actively effects us when they get together in a caravan and cross our border because their county is corrupt all the way at the highest level.

        • Cyborganism
          link
          fedilink
          English
          405 months ago

          Maybe if your country didn’t get involved into fucking up the democracy of that region for corporate interests, I would have some sympathy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -365 months ago

            Yes, because we printed all the Bolivar they printed causing hyperinflation. What in the fuck are you talking about?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              245 months ago

              I think they’re referring to the countless South American counties that America has meddled with in the past.

              Cuba, Venezuela, Argentina, etc.

              Basically, you reap what you sow.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -245 months ago

                We didn’t meddle in Venezuela. Like what are you talking about. The guy thought he had enough oil to not need the u.s as a ally anymore. He cut us off from his country and tried allying with Iraq and Cuba. He failed though.

                • archomrade [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  65 months ago

                  He cut us off

                  Cut us off from their oil, then America cut trade ties, then they allied with our adversaries because America turned their back on them simply because they were mad they nationalized their oil.

                  The guy thought he had enough oil to not need the u.s as a ally

                  Yea, that’s the point: the US views oil access and strategic alliances as interrelated. If anything I think this is just an open admission that the US DGAF about ‘democracy’ but is really only interested in the willingness of oil states to deal in their oil supply.

                  Lol America is so fucking entitled

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -15
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Let’s just looks at Venezuela.

                If we’re using Wikipedia as a source you might be interested in these parts

                Madsen alleging U.S. Navy involvement.[21] U.S. Senator Christopher Dodd, D-CT, requested an investigation of concerns that Washington appeared to condone the removal of Chávez,[22][23] which found that “U.S. officials acted appropriately and did nothing to encourage an April coup against Venezuela’s president” nor did they provide any naval logistical support.[24][25] CIA documents indicate that the Bush administration knew about a plot weeks before the April 2002 military coup. They cite a document dated 6 April 2002, which says: "dissident military factions…are stepping up efforts to organize a coup against President Chávez, possibly as early as this month.

                According to Michal Hertik, there is no benevolent relationship between the Chávez government and United States as a great power. Chávez is not interested in US foreign policy (actually President Bush’s beliefs) including “creating a unipolar or bipolar world, effort to create a powerful empire”. So he tried to break US imperialism and its interference in the affairs of foreign nation-states. Although he never tried to make South American countries agree with him.[17]

                Chávez initially accepted assistance from anyone who offered, with the United States sending helicopters and dozens of soldiers that arrived two days after the disaster. When defense minister Raúl Salazar complied with the offer of the United States’ further aid that included 450 Marines and naval engineers aboard the USS Tortuga which was setting sail to Venezuela, Chávez told Salazar to decline the offer since “[i]t was a matter of sovereignty”. Salazar became angry and assumed that Chávez’s opinion was influenced by talks with Fidel Castro, though he complied with Chávez’s order. Though additional aid was necessary, Chávez thought a more revolutionary image was more important and the USS Tortuga returned to its port.[19]

                They always hated us for no reason of our own. And wanted to take our spot as a super power. They failed.

                • Cyborganism
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  115 months ago

                  No. Trying to get rid of American influence and being independent without any US involvement is not trying to take a spot at being a super power. Get real.

                • archomrade [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  25 months ago

                  So he tried to break US imperialism and its interference in the affairs of foreign nation-states.

                  They always hated us for no reason of our own.

                  LMAO, yes, NO REASON AT ALL

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      You guys do know the US state department isn’t always lying, right?

      Only when their lips are moving.

      ITT: people that think Maduro’s government isn’t a corrupt clown show.

      It’s always funny to see folks in Western countries carefully triangulate between corrupt liberal parties, then express slack-jawed horror when foreign voters do the exact same math.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’m more than fine with Venezuelan voters choosing their own government. I just don’t trust that this election was anything other than performative considering Maduro agreed to election monitoring and then walked back on it

        Edit:

        The government has arrested collaborators and closed businesses associated with her [Machado], from a hotel where she stayed during a campaign stop to women that sold empanadas to her from their homes. Her campaign manager has sheltered at an embassy in the capital, Caracas, for months.

        This sure screams free and clear election. I was pissed off when the DNC put their thumb on the scale of the primaries against Bernie; it’s logically consistent for me to be annoyed by this bullshit as well.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -155 months ago

      Welcome to Lemmy, where Murica Bad, and the less Murica it is, the more unequivocally good it is.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    ITT: Tankies being apologists for an equally corrupt regime who obviously rigged an election.

    I also rolled my eyes when I saw the headline. US don’t really have much of credibility on this one. But tankie wankers think the election result is perfectly okay simply because “suck it 'Murica”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It’s more that we’ve got a long history of Sec of States going on record saying things that are categorically untrue. Could ABC News find us a slightly more trustworthy source? Perhaps an unnamed Iraq informant code-named Curveball? Or an FBI informant with Neo-Nazi ties looking to rat on a civil rights icon? Bill Clinton talking about a blowjob? Literally anyone more trustworthy.

    • archomrade [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -45 months ago

      US don’t really have much of credibility on this one.

      fuckin’… Yea, that’s the point

      The US doesn’t dispute foreign election results unless it benefits them; their complaint is essentially unrelated to the actual legitimacy of the results.

      Venezuela has been a target of US diplomatic aggression since they nationalized their oil. Say whatever you want about their government but their history has been fucked beyond recognition by US diplomatic intervention. That Blinken is wasting air commenting on it is simply more evidence of the US weighing in on affairs they ought to have fuck-all to do with.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 months ago

        Venezuela has been a target of US diplomatic aggression since they nationalized their oil.

        Since 1976? Venezuela’s oil was nationalized by Rafael Caldera in that year.

        And yes that Rafael Caldera, the guy Chavez tried to overthrow lmao.

        • archomrade [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Yes, it may be surprising that US relations with Venezuela began before Chavez, but it’s true

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        If the American government wants me to doubt the integrity of their election they should have kept their mouths shut and let the evidence speak for itself.

        We know they were suppressing the opposition, and by definition that means the election wasn’t free and fair. You want to do anything else? Find some proof and publish that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    135 months ago

    O boy this is gonna be civil. Does the United States have an interest in Venezuelas election because they have the largest oil reserves in the world? Or do they really care about the people in a foreign nation?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Venezuelan oil is rich in sulphur, so it is less attractive. It requires special infrastructure and buyers who have the installed capacity to deal with heavy crudes, like China and India.

      PS: funnily enough, Guyana’s crude is from a different geological segment and of higher quality and highly valuable, no wonder Maduro wants to annex it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Guyana’s crude is from a different geological segment and of higher quality and highly valuable

        The US couped Guyana back in the 60s and never let the country out from under its boot heel.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          135 months ago

          That’s an extremely flimsy claim given the PPP, an explicitly Marxist party, has held power in Guyana multiple times including this exact moment. I guess socialist solidarity ends when there are resources to extract?

          And yes I am aware the party just removed ML and socialism from their constitution but that hardly makes them US stooges.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            45 months ago

            PPP, an explicitly Marxist party, has held power in Guyana multiple times

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irfaan_Ali#Candidacy

            Immediately following his selection, Ali was accused of academic fraud, with opponents claiming that when Ali was in his early 20s, he had misrepresented one of his qualifications. Ali was also indicted on 19 charges of other fraud for allegedly defrauding the state of over $174M between 2011 and 2015, allegedly conspiring with persons unknown to “greatly undersell” 19 plots of state lands at Plantation Sparendaam and Goedverwagting in Demerara-Mahaica to current or former government officials.

            The trial on the matters was postponed several times. He was granted self bail on the charges. The lands, which were sold for $39.8M, are valued at $212.4M, according to the Special Organized Crime Unit (SOCU). On 14 August, the charges were dismissed.

            Explicitly Marxist guy who privatizes state lands to his business buddies for a fifth their asking price. Sounds very Marxist.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              95 months ago

              And yet he’s still a leader of the party that Kennedy tried to sideline in the coup you mentioned. He’s hardly the first person to sell out for personal gain.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                35 months ago

                A party that’s been hollowed out by corruption. It’s no more the Party of Marxism than the American Republican Party is the Party of Lincoln.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Great, even if true, let’s start an international war to fix it, right Sr. Maduro?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -35 months ago

            One man’s illegal invasion is another man’s democratic liberation. But this whole thing reeks of the Iraq/Kuwait conflict of '91, complete with arguments over who owns which oil field and shady corporate executives leaning on domestic news media to get people’s hate up.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              No, no it isn’t, Saddam invaded Kuwait to annex it. Let’s hope Maduro does not try to invade Guyana to annex it.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -45 months ago

                Saddam invaded Kuwait to annex it

                Saddam invaded Kuwait to halt their slant drilling project into the transboundary Rumaila oil field.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  25 months ago

                  Even if that were the only reason, that has no relation to Guyana, because these are geologically independent reservoirs.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  25 months ago

                  And also because Kuwait was the only party involved that refused some debt forgiveness for Iraq’s losses in the Iran/Iraq war backed by the US and its allies.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15 months ago

    We have our own corrupt dictator looming on the horizon. How about we redirect these concerns to our own country?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      195 months ago

      Being consistent about transparent elections no matter where they are is one way to assert how important that is, including in the US.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      The opposition ran a bunch of far-right reactionary psychos and still crested 44% of the vote. That’s definitely indicative of how far Maduro has fallen in popularity, even after an economic rebound in the wake of COVID.

      But when you run stupid candidates, you win stupid prizes. They tried to get another Jeanine Áñez white nationalist style lunatic into the President’s mansion and they flopped.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -225 months ago

    the U.S. and the international community

    the U.S. and the 15% of the world’s population that comprise the West

    Fixed that