• ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    49 minutes ago

    My sister-in-law owned a real Victorian couch. It was quite beautiful, but holy shit was that thing uncomfortable to actually sit on. The seat part was at least sprung, but it was rounded and fit no part of the human anatomy. The back and arm rests were just solid wood. Definitely from an era when you did not want guests to make it to dinner time.

  • Smaile@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I’m just happy for the person with the little bastards are using it.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The secret to get a cat to use a bed is to place it in a spot they already like to hang out at. My cat was always sitting on an end table to look out the adjacent window, so I stuck a bed there and he couldn’t be happier to lay there all day long now.

  • 13igTyme@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Most little cat furniture would be $20-50 dollar and might be poorly constructed. $100 for something that looks nice and is hopefully well made doesn’t sound so bad.

  • Ricky Rigatoni@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Ok awesome cute amazing wonderful but how the fuck are humans expected to sit in the full size version

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Perch on the edge. You aren’t supposed to sit back in furniture like that. It was really made for birds. The victorians just misunderstood it’s true purpose due to excessive corsets and absynth causing a general lack of oxygen intake.

            • DaveyRocket@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Hopefully it’s just written history, maybe men haven’t always treated women shitty…

              I always enjoyed thinking we were making progress on this, but between Trump and Hegseth I realize Atwood was right and I’m an idiot.

              • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                societal progress is rarely felt by those who start it.

                there is progress as much as there is regression.

                I’d like to think that the fact that 80 years ago women were expected to “stay home and take care of the kids” and today that’s generally not even a choice, that progress is winning.

                then again, the only reason why it was allowed to win is because capitalist growth demanded more workers…

                • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  42 minutes ago

                  80 years ago women were expected to “stay home and take care of the kids”

                  Ironically, 80 years ago was immediately after American women had just won WWII (checks nervously to make sure we’re not on ml) by going into the factories and making the weapons that the men needed to fulfill their proper role of going out and dying. The women being homemakers shit was a calculated strategy to give their jobs back to the men who survived.

    • Duranie@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It also depends on the cats that live there. We have an adopted cat for the last year and a half that was a street cat picked up from a larger City. He’s very social, has zero personal boundaries, and will explore any horizontal surface that he can climb his way to. That said, he only scratches on things that we put out for him to scratch on. Granted, we have multiple scratching posts throughout the house, and other assorted cardboard scratchers available to him. But so far we haven’t seen him consider the furniture.

      • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This is his home as much as it is mine. Plus most of my furniture is second hand so it doesn’t cost as much.

    • BertramDitore@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Velvet is surprisingly resistant to cat scratches. I have a velvet cover on my leather couch, and my cat goes to town on it with his claws. I can usually “wipe away” the scratch marks, and they’ve never punctured through to the leather.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Depends on the cat. Cat hair on the other hand, I’d recommend a secondary surface for catching as much as possible.