• Omnipitaph@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I wonder how many people on Lemmy want to move to China based on what they’ve heard about it on this collective network or in their own circles. How many of those people would be sorely disappointed if they did?

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      A lot of them come across as Ariel in Disney’s The Little Mermaid. They have an incomplete understanding of China and also likely have legitimate reasons to not want to live where they are.

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Good. The way it should be. Housing is not wealth storage, it’s a place to live.
    Let’s hop this fall spreads out of China.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That does assume the Chinese housing market is the same as in many western countries though. But if so, bring it on.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        It fits somewhat with American sunbelt cities where there is significant growth and large developers building new houses. One issue which is common across borders is that real estate was a common way for people to invest their retirement savings; wiping out a lot of the savings of people near or at retirement isn’t healthy. One issue that is more local to China is that Chinese provinces and municipalities have little ability to raise taxes, so they’ve been using development as a way to raise money; a lot of these governments have a lot of debt and few good ways to pay it back.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s great for people who want to buy a house, great for ultra rich that want to buy out more property, but absolutely fucking people who just bought a house not too long ago.

      • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If you just bought (assuming standard 30 yr mortgage), all you have to do is hold through it. Refinance if that becomes favorable.

        The only losers are those who are free and clear or toward the end of their mortgage AND looking to utilize the equity they built up, OR anyone looking to sell. The solution is time, which can kinda suck, but it’s vastly preferable to not having a place to live.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I feel like people forget that a significant portion of America lives in a place where the cost-of-living isn’t ridiculously high. A housing crash might make houses slightly more affordable in San Francisco, but it would be economically devastating to the interior of the country.

        Honestly it probably wouldn’t even be that great for people who wanted to buy a house. Banks aren’t likely to start handing out mortgages to people who couldn’t afford the house a couple weeks ago in what is now a volatile market, and you would still be competing with companies who could pay cash.

          • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            For everyone… not just poor people who need a loan, but people who can pay cash too… which is what I said.

            • Windex007@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              That is how supply and demand works, though. If the prices drop, and suddenly cash buyers start pouring out of the woodwork, that will drive prices back up.

              When you see prices fall, it necessarily means the cash buyers are not just swooping in and grabbing everything.

              • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Yes which would mean that the cash buyers would have all the houses and the people who needed loans wouldn’t. Which was my point.

                • Windex007@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  That is not what that means.

                  I promise I understand what you’re saying. I’m saying the fault in your logic is misunderstanding the upward pressure of cash buyers.

                  When prices fall, it isn’t chum in the water for corporate cash buyers. What it means is that those same buyers were ALWAYS there, and are now leaving. The absence of thier buy pressure is the cause of the prices falling.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I didn’t realize San Francisco is the only city in the US. Rent in every single urban area is out of control. A two bedroom apartment that I rented in Lexington, KY from 1996-2011 for $500 a month is now $1,800.

              A studio apartment that I rented in Altoona, PA from 2011- 2013 for $700 a month is now $1200.

              I could keep looking, as I have rented places in 38 states.

              No where that isn’t rural is cheap in the US anymore. Even the most “affordable” cities are boasting about 1 br apartments that are $1,000+ a month.

              • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I hate to break it to you but those prices are barely more than inflation. $700 in 2011 is $1065 today. And I didn’t say anything about San Francisco being the only city in the US now you’re just reaching.

                • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Not reaching, just using your own hyperbole in reverse.

                  I hate to break it to you, but inflation hasn’t done a thing to minimum wage, or wages in general.

    • Waterpumpee@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Building and renting out should be profitable. Else nothing is built for renters. Problem is companies buying homes (not building) and try to bribe local politics to upgrade zoning laws for more profitable housing (more flats per m2 land, less living quality). There are cases where lots should be merged for upgrading zonings but this should come from the communities needs not companies’ greeds.

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Building and renting out should be non-profit based. It should cover it’s cost, but not be attractive to investors - that keeps the prices from rising. Doesn’t mean that the people doing this work shouldn’t be able to live a decent life, but non-profits can pay normal salaries too.

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The result is property developers buying up swathes of land and leaving it vacant until the market reaches a frenzy and they can charge an unholy price for their crappy tract homes built by subcontractors under extreme cost reduction pressures. It doesn’t meet market demand, not remotely.

        Zoning and local councils are certainly complicit.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It peaked in 2021, so apparently prices have been declining for 5 years, and are still declining!!
    The Chinese economy may be weird, but I don’t get how prices can fall below what they were 20 years ago, when China is much richer today than they were back then? We were told for a long time China was in a huge housing bubble, but this is crazy!
    This will guaranteed ruin many peoples economy for decades even for the rest of their lives. And many will be tied to their house because it’s impossible to sell at a price that will clear the debt, so they can’t afford to move.
    In a normal market it’s nice to own your own house, but a market like this, if you bought 5 years ago, it’s a nightmare.

    • signor@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The housing market is different in China. Most home are paid entirely at sale without a loan.

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      China was building housing like crazy, and companies kept the prices artificially inflated, even though that created literal ghost towns and a number of buildings had to be demolished due to safety reasons…

      Now with the bubble popped, prices are resetting to market value, and since this means a new swathe of newly affordable housing, that availability drives prices down even further.

      Think of it like this: you’re sitting on 3 million tonnes of apples. You’re selling each apple for $50. Nobody but a few idiots are buying them. Then you suddenly need the cash, and start dropping the prices - you have to go below market rates to offload all those apples to raise capital. And the raw amount of supply means you’re going way under market prices, dragging other sellers with you.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yes I know all that, bubbles result in stupid projects and poor quality, and banks stupidly believing growth will continue, so loaning to buy a house is easy. that’s the same here. I know how bubbles work.
        But China has had an economic growth rate on an average of 10% many years of that period, it’s slowed down a bit in recent years but is still high.
        But let’s say 15 years with 10% growth, that means the economy has grown 4 times in 15 years!!
        So it’s crazy that prices fall back to less than when the economy was only 25% of what it is now.
        Your description doesn’t explain that.