FYI if you’re unfamiliar with ballistics, as most people never think about it. When a bullet is fired out of a gun, it is dropping downward at the same speed as if you were holding in your hand and just let it go.
People who don’t normally shoot rifles never really stop to think about that. The forward velocity doesn’t keep the bullet from falling towards the ground any slower. Rifles usually fire the bullet at a slight upward trajectory because of this. So it may climb an inch and a half higher over the first 100 yards before it starts heading towards the ground.
Since he was decreasing in altitude (presumably at approximately a straight diagonal vector) and the bullets were traveling in an arc, I guess the linear distance travelled by the plane is less than that travelled by the bullets?
Either way, I think “out-ran” is appropriate here since the plane was necessarily ahead of the bullet on the horizontal plane since it was hit by the bullets.
How is that not catching up to them?
FYI if you’re unfamiliar with ballistics, as most people never think about it. When a bullet is fired out of a gun, it is dropping downward at the same speed as if you were holding in your hand and just let it go.
People who don’t normally shoot rifles never really stop to think about that. The forward velocity doesn’t keep the bullet from falling towards the ground any slower. Rifles usually fire the bullet at a slight upward trajectory because of this. So it may climb an inch and a half higher over the first 100 yards before it starts heading towards the ground.
Since he was decreasing in altitude (presumably at approximately a straight diagonal vector) and the bullets were traveling in an arc, I guess the linear distance travelled by the plane is less than that travelled by the bullets?
Either way, I think “out-ran” is appropriate here since the plane was necessarily ahead of the bullet on the horizontal plane since it was hit by the bullets.