Also bei all den kritischen Kommentaren hier kann ich wirklich nur empfehlen, sich den verabschiedeten Text mal durchzulesen. Schlüsselpunkte:

1. Calls on the Commission to propose, without delay, legislation establishing an EU-wide definition of rape that is based on the requirement of freely given, informed consent that can be withdrawn, in line with Article 36 of the Istanbul Convention;

[…]

7. Stresses that only a clear, affirmative, freely given and unambiguous indication of consent is valid and that silence, a lack of verbal or physical resistance or the absence of a ‘no’ cannot be interpreted as consent, and that prior consent, past sexual conduct or any past or present relationship with an offender, including marital or any other partnership status, does not imply ongoing or future consent for any sexual acts; stresses that consent can be withdrawn at any time before or during a sexual act; notes that consent can be expressed in any way as long as it is given voluntarily as a result of the person’s free will and is assessed in the context of the surrounding circumstances, in accordance with Article 36 of the Istanbul Convention;
8. Underlines that consent must be assessed in the context of the surrounding circumstances, recognising that consent cannot be given where there is violence, threat, surprise, deceit, an abuse of power, including control, coercion, a physical or mental condition, such as a state of fear, intimidation, unconsciousness, freezing caused by fear or trauma, intoxication, chemical submission, sleep, illness, bodily injury, disability or in an otherwise particularly vulnerable situation, or age; acknowledges that such states can prevent the ability to give voluntary and informed consent;

Gibt es jemanden, der das ernsthaft nicht für eine sinnvolle Basis hält?