• Technically, the new law will raise the legal age requirement in the UK for buying cigarettes, cigars or tobacco, which is currently 18, by one year in every subsequent year, starting on January 1, 2027
  • This will effectively mean that people born on or after January 1, 2009 will never be eligible to buy them
  • Retailers will face financial penalties for selling the products to those not entitled to them
  • The government will also be empowered to impose a new registration system for smoking and vaping products entering the country, seeking to improve oversight
  • The bill will expand the UK’s indoor smoking ban to a series of outdoor public spaces, for instance in children’s playgrounds, outside schools and hospitals
  • Most indoor spaces that are designated smoke-free will become vape-free as well
  • Smoking in designated areas outside pubs and bars and other hospitality settings will remain permissible
  • Smoking and vaping will remain legal in people’s homes
  • Vaping will become illegal in cars if someone under the age of 18 is inside, to match existing rules on smoking
  • Advertising for smoking and vaping products will be banned
  • People aged 18 or older will remain eligible to purchase vaping products, but some items targeted at younger consumers like disposable vapes have already been outlawed as part of the program
  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 小时前

    So… answer me this. Why? Why should anyone be able to tell us what we can and can’t do in our own homes, if it isn’t impacting anyone else?

    • Blander_Rurton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 小时前

      Not bothered about what people do in their own homes, moreso what they do in public. Vape isn’t a pleasant smell and we don’t know the impacts of second hand vapour

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 小时前

        Okay, but what you suggested wasn’t focused on what they do in public. It was on the product itself.

        Phase out allowing smoking in public, fine, that fits what you are saying. But raising taxes on them and such would mean there is someone who can no longer smoke in their own home because it is now too expensive.

        I personally hate cigarettes and such. But I don’t think I or anyone should be doing things to stop others from enjoying what I hate if it doesn’t impact me. It’s just none of my business.

        • Jako302@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          26 分钟前

          Ever lived next to someone that was smoking at home? The smoke doesn’t care about property borders and will find its way into neighboring apartments and yards.

          The only way to smoke without bothering anyone is if you live somewhere in the woods in bumfuck nowhere.

          Once your law covers all eventualities regarding this, its so convoluted that banning is the better option.

        • Blander_Rurton@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 分钟前

          Maybe so, but they are terrible for you and there shouldn’t be incentive to do it. Vapes are very cheap, this is partly why they’re so popular with children. Maybe it they were a bit pricier then people would think twice. Can also put tax towards public health service.

        • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          47 分钟前

          Even if they’re smoking at home, the enormous costs to the healthcare system caused by smokers every year are a burden on the shoulders of everyone in society.