• skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    [] Leo said. "He revealed the gentle face of God, who always rejects violence.

    I think my Bible might be faulty

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The Israelites were YAHWEH’s special people, so when they are oppressed it’s bad, but they are obligated to genocide anyone that stands in their way. Even babies and animals.

      This should sound familiar even you have never read a line of a Bible or Torah.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      No no no. That was the Old Testament which doesn’t count anymore.

      The New Testament is the one that we care about (except we’ve we don’t)

      • Enfors@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Because God’s absolute morality somehow changes over time while still being absolute, because something or other that makes no sense.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I mean, that’s not wild on it’s face. You can explain shifting morality with respect to changing material conditions and social relationships.

          I might argue that the Old Testament God was intended to offer leverage to the intelligencia (priest class) over the military/aristocracy (kings and their courtiers).

          Meanwhile, the New Testament was fundamentally describing a God of Slaves, preaching equinimity and grace in the next life for the hardships of the modern day.

          And then, when the slave class overthrew and supplanted the Pagan aristocracy, suddenly the Old Testament was back in fashion again.

          It makes sense historically