You asked me an irrelevant question, because the original point, to which you replied, was not if bombing stuff did anything.

I think you’ve misread something. The statement I replied to was this one:

The only bombing that actually led to results was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

In that statement, you made the claim that no other bombing than those of Hiroshima and Nagasaki did anything. I’m challenging that claim, which means I’m saying “I’m not convinced that your claim is true”. Don’t confuse that with me saying “I’m convinced that your claim is false”.

That’s irrelevant to this point. I asked you a yes / no question. You’re free to concede the point if you don’t want to answer.

So the bombing of tanks, factories, trains, and bridges did nothing?

stir them up a bit more just by being there minding your own business speaking “foreign” and looking tanned

pearl-cluthing intensifies