• marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 days ago

    On the case of the real drone, the laser is destroying the cable.

    On the OP’s case, yes a laser can interrupt the communication. But the drone needs to keep sending it, or the drone will just continue after it’s gone. On the other hand, you need less power.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        If you can inject commands into a communication line, somebody was really stupid while designing it.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Which happens, but then a different idiot tends to fix it. See what happened with the Starlink-controlled drones.

        • einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Well those fiber optic line end points are not exactly encrypted, they use off the shelf components like HDMI over Fiber adapters, and serial over fiber for control link. In rare cases they could maybe use a actual IP connection over fiber but i doubt that since, it would add overhead, latency and make the hardware setup a lot more complex and expensive (if would be able to encrypt tho).

            • einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              no, because often its not “internet/network over fiber” stuff but HDMI over fiber no ip there. HDMI cables have very limited lenght due to high frequency beeing used in em, so if you have a media production company and a few spread out cameras HDMI over fiber is kinda common