That’s a hot take I’d expect to hear from a 12 year old.

Assuming it’s a real tweet my guess would be that the last reply appeared on their inbox out of context so they thought they were responding to the original tweet. Since Twitter is a shit platform with shit conversation structure I think it’s likely assuming it’s real.

What lack of wealth would require you to read a linked in influencer post?

What if you’re the one that was in charge of adding safe guards?

That would only be a problem if you need dynamically allocated memory. It could be a statically allocated simulation where every atom is accounted for.

I’m equating probability with guessing here, but yes there is a nuanced difference.

More like large guessing models. They have no thought process, they just produce words.

All of these would

Having a never ending subscription has even higher interest.

The monthly subscription model leaves me feeling so very conflicted. On one hand, it’s a way to get an important piece of safety equipment for less money up front, which is good—there’s certainly cheaper airbag vests, but there’s more expensive ones, too.

No, no, there’s nothing conflicting here. If you need expensive safety equipment that you can’t afford up front there’s already a solution for that, it’s called financing. There is no upside to this, it’s just unethical, irresponsible, and dumb.