• rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Fuck yea, RAM swap? I bought both my laptop and desktop when RAM was cheap, and got more memory than I needed. I can safely allocate like 12GB to CRAM!

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The win from CRAM is that it is not swap, and operates using mostly normal RAM semantics. If it works as advertised you should be able to allocate most (all?!) of your RAM as CRAM.

      • MacFearrs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I would guess this is only useful in servers, as for day to day use you ideally want the lowest latency you can for responsiveness. That said, if there’s a way you can specify which type processes can use, that may be useful in some cases

        • klankin@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          51 minutes ago

          Honestly though CPU processing is going to add almost no latency at all.

          Almost all latency is sending to the RAM itself, so if you can compress it in a CPU cache before sending it, its nearly free RAM space.

          Also systems are fucked fast these days you could probably make something responsive in pure python - other than millisecond timing scenarios like medical and audio stuff

        • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Depends on the workload. This probably would not be great for gaming or audio production, but it might be for video editing and local LLMs