• solitaire404@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Social media was not a mistake, but unregulated social media was.

    The whole incentive for businessman to ‘innovate’ in tech is to skirt around the law. We have had laws about theft for centuries, but now since its ‘digital’ theft we have to write new laws for some reason?

    Just an example, but social media/tech unregulated is what got us here.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      When governments tried to regulate digital stuff 30 years ago, we got anti-circumvention laws that let corporations put digital locks on everything that are illegal to break. It would be hard to convince me governments regulating social media 20 years ago would have been anything short of a disaster.

      • davel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I doubt it would have been all that different, because those laws would have been written by the same capitalist class that runs corporate social media today.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I agree, the problem is the Sillicon Valley, VC-backed business model. If it was allowed to develop slower and less commercially, what would evolve would have been much less unhealthy for society

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Social media was not a mistake, but unregulated social media was.

      You’re so right, the open source, non-profit threadiverse would be so much better if bourgeois states censored us.