ooli3@sopuli.xyz to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 6 days agoAll goated methodsi.redd.itimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1219arrow-down14
arrow-up1215arrow-down1imageAll goated methodsi.redd.itooli3@sopuli.xyz to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareRiQuY@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27arrow-down2·6 days agoWith the added complexity that it can fail for reasons I don’t comprehed. If it was just extracting that wouldn’t fail under any circumstances.
minus-squaremorto@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·6 days ago With the added complexity that it can fail for reasons I don’t comprehed The lovecraftian installer
minus-squaregnufuu@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day ago“Would you like to wake from its slumber the ancient daemon once known by the name of DirectX 9? (recommended)”
minus-squareDdCno1@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·6 days agoThe only times it has failed on me was because either the storage device or RAM were faulty. It’s definitely worth it to check both for errors every once in a while, as financially devastating as it is to replace either.
minus-squareCyberTerry@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·5 days agoIt’s your RAM bro
With the added complexity that it can fail for reasons I don’t comprehed. If it was just extracting that wouldn’t fail under any circumstances.
The lovecraftian installer
“Would you like to wake from its slumber the ancient daemon once known by the name of DirectX 9? (recommended)”
The only times it has failed on me was because either the storage device or RAM were faulty. It’s definitely worth it to check both for errors every once in a while, as financially devastating as it is to replace either.
It’s your RAM bro