https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/north-america/#monthly-200901-202607

https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer?dataSet=http&groupBy=os&dt=28d&loc=north-america&filters=deviceType%253DDESKTOP

Cloudflare stats also seem to support peaks of 15% usage but around 9-10% on average. In the United States alone, the market share for Linux is nearly 12% now for the whole month and Cloudflare stats suggest peaks of up to 25% (!) Linux desktop usage on certain days and times.

The trendline suggests this is just the start. When will companies realize they cannot ignore Linux anymore?

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Honestly, at this point I don’t think Microsoft cares about Windows all that much. They make their money elsewhere, and even the control offered by owning the OS can’t be counted on, as the Internet Explorer wars showed.

    At the same time, think about the weird coincidence that Windows 11 requires so much extra hardware firepower at the same time as said hardware firepower has become stupid expensive thanks to the same AI the company is pushing.

    They made it unaffordable to run Windows 11, and that’s how we get the Year of Linux on the Desktop?

    • Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’ve been saying this since the release of WSL, but Microsoft has everything to gain from switching to the Linux kernel. Even back then senior devs were being laid off, and quality kept backsliding.

      Fiscally, why would they want to maintain a whole ass kernel and OS layer when they could probably get away with some sort of custom Atomic Fedora distro?

      It’s only exacerbated by AI slop now. Their NT team will continue to shrink, and they’ll be left with no other options.

      • yoru77@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        It would be so funny if they “outsource” their kernel to linux, because it would be cheaper… “Hey, hey, I’ve seen this one. I’ve seen this one. This is a classic!” ~Marty McFly

      • manxu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        They also gave up really quick on mandating Windows Server on Azure and are now mightily happy to offer the latest and greatest Linux versions. I think you are onto something there: if it weren’t for compatibility, it would be so much cheaper for Microsoft to just use the Linux kernel.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      to be fair the internet explorer debacle is behind us, and we are way past the zeitgeist of holding them accountable for antitrust.

      they can pump windows full of ads no problem and that should count to something but it’s never enough for them is it?

      i think microsoft just doesn’t know what to do with windows and it shows (and it’s for the best, really)

    • lemmysir@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      To be fair they released 11 before the latest price surges, might have been during the graphics cards price hikes though, can’t remember when that happened.

      • manxu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Very true, but they also caused some of the price hikes with their Copilot push, no?