• CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Sunk cost fallacy. Russia’s blunders will be one for the history books and will be in lectures of geopolitical and military academies for a long long time.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Sunk cost fallacy.

      Not quite. If Putin surrenders now he’ll be falling out of a window, so this is more or less rational self-preservation on the part of the people actually making these decisions.

      • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 hours ago

        There were several ready offramps at certain stages throughout. Now that you’re broke and starting to lose ground it’s harder to declare victory and erect a statue.

      • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Surrender? I like the way you think but I’d settle for an end of war. Either way, for what he has done to Russia, I think he’s on his way out a window either way. The public would be greatful for a change in leadership. Putin opened his own window.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I like the way you think but I’d settle for an end of war.

          Even if it wasn’t a surrender, it’d definitely be spun as such by his political rivals. He needs to save face somehow and the only way to do that is new territory that Ukraine isn’t going to let him have.

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s not really sunk cost fallacy. It’s just doing what keeps him alive at this point.