Ubuntu is the leading distro, if I’m not mistaken. It’s also compatible with Mint, Zorin, Xubuntu, etc, which are another leading distros than Fedora. Is it only for redhat users or secondary distro?

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Right, they provide the funding for the developers keeping one of the most accessible distros going so whats the problem?

      • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Canonical’s engineering is poor. They build weird stuff, and they want to close Linux off through CLA and permissive licenses. They aren’t a trust worthy company.

        RH does more. RH is Linux for all intents and purposes.

        Fedora is better. At one time, Ubuntu was good, but that was 20 years ago. The Fedora community has done a great job of stepping up to make it a great desktop distribution.

        • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I can’t recall the history exactly, but Red Hat was once free. Then it seems like I recall CentOS or Fedora replacing it as the FOSS fork. I’m old and my memory sucks. Anyone else recall?

          • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Yeah, RH Linux was free at one point. I remember getting CDs with a book in the ‘90s and when it was discontinued in favor of RHEL.

            Fedora was supposed to be the replacement for RH Linux. It was supposed to be what CentOS is today, a close upstream for RHEL, but the Fedora community had other ideas. 🙂

        • neclimdul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think with that argument its better to point out Fedora has taken pains to isolate itself from Redhat/IBM. Because while IBM has historically had great engineering, they are not know for great licensing. In fact the basically destroyed and entire enterprise ecosystem recently with the licensing changes to RHEL.

          • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, the Fedora community revolted when RH tried to force Fedora to be what they wanted, and RH left Fedora to the community after that. 😆

            Moving CentOS upstream of RHEL? That was a good thing. RHEL didn’t have a true upstream, and now that is CentOS. The RHEL and the clones now have a central place to upstream code, and they now are the EL ecosystem instead of only RHEL. It’s created more diversity and has added more options.

            For example, Alma doesn’t have to be bug-for-bug compatible with RHEL. They can carry their own patches and add features which their base wants and only be binary compatible.