inari@piefed.zip to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-22 months agoOfficial Linux position on LLM usage in kernel developmentlore.kernel.orgexternal-linkmessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up1114arrow-down11 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1113arrow-down1external-linkOfficial Linux position on LLM usage in kernel developmentlore.kernel.orginari@piefed.zip to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square114fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarebountygiver [any]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·edit-22 months agoYes, but allowing floodgates of AI work to come in it lowers the bar and allow more mistakes to flow in. Just because humans make mistakes doesn’t mean we are ok with shipping mistakes
minus-square𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoHe’s not saying that, he is saying LLMs are a tool and can therefore be used. He’s not saying AI generated code gets a free pass into the kernel just because an LLM says it looks good.
Yes, but allowing floodgates of AI work to come in it lowers the bar and allow more mistakes to flow in.
Just because humans make mistakes doesn’t mean we are ok with shipping mistakes
He’s not saying that, he is saying LLMs are a tool and can therefore be used. He’s not saying AI generated code gets a free pass into the kernel just because an LLM says it looks good.