Be civil and follow principle of charity in the comments.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Why do so many vegans seek conflict instead of educating others? It’s pretty clear that this post seeks solely to declare non-vegans hypocrites.

    Good idea using your shit-stirring alt for this one though.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Carnists: Murder, rape, torture, slavery

      Vegans: Once in a blue moon literally just saying something about it in public

      One of these is immoral. You’ll be shocked at which this boomer reference username thinks it is!

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Using the word carnist is like screaming “I am a huge asshole and I think I’m superior”. I won’t be seeing your replies.

        Ps. Hilarious you think anything from the 90s is for boomers. You’re just telling me you’re an awkward gen z

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Dick Tracy, famous pulp comic from the 1990s

          I won’t be seeing your replies.

          I’M NOT CIS I’M NORMAL REEEEEEEEEEE

          (They’re afraid of talking to someone with above a 5th grade vocabulary)

          • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Technically Dick Tracy is pre-boomer as it started in the 30s. Though it ran till the 70s I think so kinda works both ways. Simply biazzare that the other guy thinks it started in the 90s though either way.

    • when@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I have no mischievous intent against any group. I just saw some moral inconsistency. So I though let’s AskLemmy about their opinion on this topic. People are answering pretty rationally and are not just outright dismissive.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Your question is clearly dismissive itself. I have no reason to think it’s in good faith, especially considering you seem to only post from this account rarely and to stir up shit

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Their responses are clear and methodical, giving the impression that OP is genuinely trying to discuss a potentially-tricky subject in a calm, rational manner. If they were here to “stir up shit,” surely they’d be responding in a way that encourages more drama. From the evidence, I don’t believe that’s their intent at all.

          Sometimes people want to discuss difficult topics, even if there’s a risk of people taking it the wrong way. I’d say OP’s doing a decent job encouraging civility, and that’s something I wish we could see more of online.