• Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I didn’t invent anything.

    Really?

    “it’s a totally useless term that can only be used as a dogwhistle.”

    This you?

    If you can’t see the strawmanning here, you’re one or more of unselfaware, unable to back down when you’re wrong, disingenuous or malicious.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s not a strawman or an invention, it’s literally what the person was saying.

      Are you fixating on the fact that it wasn’t verbatim? Because I had to elucidate the subtext, since otherwise you’ll pretend subtext doesn’t exist.

      And there you go pretending subtext doesn’t exist. Amazing.

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        And there you go pretending context doesn’t exist. Amazing.

        That’s not a strawman or an invention, it’s literally what the person was saying.

        You and I clearly use the word literally very differently. I use it considerably more honestly and literally than you do.

        If you can’t see the strawmanning here, you’re one or more of unselfaware, unable to back down when you’re wrong, disingenuous or malicious.

        I’m leaning towards options (b) and © here.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          37 minutes ago

          You’re the one ignoring context.

          Also, you’re confusing “literal” with “verbatim.” A paraphrase doesn’t have to be verbatim to be literal, and likewise a quote can be verbatim without being literal.

          And you’re the one strawmanning.