I still don’t see any public discussion on why Israel should be allowed to have nukes, and not Iran. That is the core idea of deterrence.
Israel has so much kompromat on western politicians, that they are basically held by their balls.
Also, the US Involvement in the war is almost certainly fueled by all the shit Israel has on Turd. The Epstein files, considering Epstein was a Mossad agent, must de devastating.
I understand not wanting dictatorships to have nukes. Look at North Korea for example. So far we’re good, but eventually someone that is absolutely insane could be appointed and then South Korea no longer exists. The history of the Roman Empire shows us what can go wrong,.now imagine it with nukes.
Of course the US’s democracy is off the rails too so who knows. I guess ideally the leader can change every 4 years at least. Just gotta keep them away from the nukes.
Now all that being said any country not building nukes is setting themselves up for failure. Nukes mean you have sovereignty in the modern era.
The liberal brain is fascinating. North Korea A) isn’t a dictatorship, Kim Jong-un does not have a military role, B) Got nukes to prevent what is happening to Iran happening to them again. C) Wants reunification with its stolen land more than anything. Really current 5-10-15 year plans are to finally stabilize after the US killed 25% of their population during their invasion and current occupation, but long term the goal is always reunifcation – peaceful reunification – after the Amerisraeli empire inevitably falls or at least stops devoting resources to its occupation of the southern peninsula.
Anyway see my last paragraph for point B, a point I already made. Every nation that wants sovereignty should be building nukes because that’s the world order that’s been established.
And finally I’m not a liberal nor a tankie obviously. I know it’s hard to comprehend a 3rd option (it’s not conservative either btw).
I still don’t see any public discussion on why Israel should be allowed to have nukes, and not Iran. That is the core idea of deterrence.
Israel has so much kompromat on western politicians, that they are basically held by their balls.
Also, the US Involvement in the war is almost certainly fueled by all the shit Israel has on Turd. The Epstein files, considering Epstein was a Mossad agent, must de devastating.
Plus djt, in all his infinite wisdom, accepted a golden pager.
I understand not wanting dictatorships to have nukes. Look at North Korea for example. So far we’re good, but eventually someone that is absolutely insane could be appointed and then South Korea no longer exists. The history of the Roman Empire shows us what can go wrong,.now imagine it with nukes.
Of course the US’s democracy is off the rails too so who knows. I guess ideally the leader can change every 4 years at least. Just gotta keep them away from the nukes.
Now all that being said any country not building nukes is setting themselves up for failure. Nukes mean you have sovereignty in the modern era.
The liberal brain is fascinating. North Korea A) isn’t a dictatorship, Kim Jong-un does not have a military role, B) Got nukes to prevent what is happening to Iran happening to them again. C) Wants reunification with its stolen land more than anything. Really current 5-10-15 year plans are to finally stabilize after the US killed 25% of their population during their invasion and current occupation, but long term the goal is always reunifcation – peaceful reunification – after the Amerisraeli empire inevitably falls or at least stops devoting resources to its occupation of the southern peninsula.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
Feel free to learn more about the world little one.
Shucks! I forgot that NK isn’t a dictatorship! My bad.
Lmao
Anyway see my last paragraph for point B, a point I already made. Every nation that wants sovereignty should be building nukes because that’s the world order that’s been established.
And finally I’m not a liberal nor a tankie obviously. I know it’s hard to comprehend a 3rd option (it’s not conservative either btw).