President Trump on Wednesday said he is considering the formation of a “joint venture” with Iran to set up tolls in the Strait of Hormuz after the Trump administration and Tehran agreed to a two-week ceasefire deal.

[…]

The president also suggested Monday that the U.S. could impose its own tolls on vessels trying to transit through the channel. Leaders in Tehran signaled last week it would install a “toll booth” system to exert a price on ships seeking safe passage through the strait.

  • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    This is insane. I don’t know why this hasn’t got wider news coverage.

    I were not able to find a better news article, but this news article somehow failed to mention the central fact that anybody demanding tolls, whether Iran or USA or both, is unambiguously illegal under international law. It is an international strait, and there is right of navigation for ships. Legal Eagle describes why the tolls are illegal: Trump’s Illegalist War Gets Illegaler.

    • einkorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It is an international strait, and there is right of navigation for ships.

      Says who? May I introduce you to the wonderful world of gunboat diplomacy? /s

      • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Says who?

        The most extraordinary thing here is perhaps that the US is not saying so. With Trump talking about imposing tolls. It used to be that like the #1 priority of Pax Americana was to insure international freedom of navigation.

        But Trump just casually throws that out the window, I assume in an unvetted 2AM Truth Social rant (I haven’t actually checked where and when Trump said it).

          • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Trump is President. Trump is the US right now. It is dangerous to pretend he is not.

            And it is not just an aberration. Congress could remove Trump any time they wanted to. But they do not.

    • realitista@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah because the law is the one thing that can stop Trump, right? Let’s stop kidding ourselves. The only thing proven to stop Trump is leverage and force. It doesn’t even take that much because he’s so stupid he can’t usually figure out ways around it.

      • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Everybody benefits from the free trade system working - and that depends on international freedom of navigation law being respected. Also Trump voting Republicans, and Republican Congressmen, benefit.

        In a sane world, US voters would stop Trump. In their own rational self interest.

        • realitista@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          None of Trump’s voters are anywhere near understanding this though. They overwhelmingly vote against their own rational self interests time and time again. So a sane world is not the one we get.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s fully within the territorial waters of Iran or Oman. I’m not an international law expert but it seems that it’s a practiced convention not a legally enforceable rule.

      Besides, international law is about who has the bigger stick.

      • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        not a legally enforceable rule.

        Anything is enforceable with enough bombs, if there is a will. Any previous US President, Democrat or Republican, would have enforced it no question.

          • 8oow3291d@feddit.dkOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            as authorities

            You can pick any authority you want. No reasonable person disagree on what international law says here.