• gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I do rather hate that so many news orgs seem to be using polymarket et al as a drop-in replacement for actual polling, because polymarket is loosely affiliated, if at all, with reality. It’s a fucking betting platform. There’s nothing scientific or statistical about it that aligns with demographic realities.

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      But at the same time Polymarket seems a bit like a self fulfilling prophecy - because Polymarket says something, it by itself increases the odds of that event happening; and in the cases where it isn’t this way, look for the large amount of bets 2 hours before the event in questing, a.k.a the “GOP spike”.

    • Null User Object@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Not to mention that a quality poll would just be among qualified likely voters in the election in question, where as polymarket is just gambling addicts anywhere on the planet.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      On the other hand, it’s well designed to surface inside information. Exactly the thing that lots of people complain about, but it’s a good thing if you’d like to use the prediction market to make predictions like this.