• Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If it’s just to test the equipment why risk the lives of the astronauts?

    • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Because future missions might also be manned. Better to risk small missions first to iron out the kinks than to have a big problem later that could have been noticed by you know, testing the vessel.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Because they need to sell this porkbarrel to the public.

      Read the comments…we would rather send a few people to a dead rock than cure diseases.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s not one or the other with spaceflight and curing diseases

          It is in 2025 onwards. The country is $39T in debt, tens of billions got funneled to SpaceX on a failed Mars project, and in the same year, $35B gets cut from NIH.

          Lucky for Trump, you guys have you heads so far up your asses looking at rockets and shiny things, no one will notice.

      • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Science from space has been used plenty of times to help advance medicine though, along with plenty of other areas. And the thing about it is, you never know what you’re going to discover until you actually discover it.

        NASA budget is 3% of the US military budget, maybe focus complaints where it’s actually warranted.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          NASA budget is 3% of the US military budget, maybe focus complaints where it’s actually warranted.

          All diseases research is 0% of the US military budget.

        • just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          We already know how to build houses or grow food, yet we still have a housing crisis and famines around the world.

          What good will these potential cures bring? We already have cures for many many diseases, why are those diseases still existing?

          Any potential cures from this will ultimately be owned by the same corpos that own current cures/tech. And it will be sold back to the people for hundred of thousands of dollers in order to justify their huge “R&D” costs.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            What good will these potential cures bring? We already have cures for many many diseases, why are those diseases still existing?

            You should spread this message in hospitals. Lemmy, impossible to under estimate.