• leagman1@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Growing up I legitimately thought the US were the head of NATO. Gotta admit that I only recently, like a good few years ago, found out that’s not true.

    The way they act is so bizarre, no matter from which angle you approach the topic.

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Growing up I legitimately thought the US were the head of NATO.

      Depending on what exactly you mean by “head of NATO”, they kind of are.

      The Supreme Allied Commander Europe has always been an American General. So in case of an actual NATO war in Europe, the US would be in charge of coordinating joint military operations.

      • leagman1@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I meant sort of like the US government being able to more or less directly command NATO, calling all the shots atleast.

        • remon@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Right, the US couldn’t just take command of NATO and other member states’ militaries without those countries signing off on it. But they can basically use political pressure to make countries join their excursions, like what happened after 9/11 (the only time Article 5 was ever invoked). And well, the “defensive” aspect of that entire campaign is questionable …

          So while they don’t have direct control, I’d still say the US is very much the “head of NATO”.