The United Nations General Assembly has voted to recognise the enslavement of Africans during the transatlantic slave trade as “the gravest crime against humanity”, a move advocates hope will pave the way for healing and justice.

The resolution - proposed by Ghana - called for this designation, while also urging UN member states to consider apologising for the slave trade and contributing to a reparations fund. It does not mention a specific amount of money.

The proposal was adopted with 123 votes in favour and three against - the United States, Israel and Argentina.

Countries like the UK have long rejected calls to pay reparations, saying today’s institutions cannot be held responsible for past wrongs.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Not going to dispute this other than to say that it’s “the gravest crime against humanity in MODERN TIMES.”

    In past times, enslaving the populations of entire conquered nations or villages was common. Bringing slaves back to Rome was a regular part of an Army’s return. Enslaving one’s neighbors has been extremely common across the globe, since the beginning of humanity.

    Beyond slavery, there have been marauders like the Huns or the Khans, who would attack a city, and kill every single living thing, and then move on the the next one.

    Unfortunately, there are lots of candidates for the award.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Trans-atlantic slavery was worse because it maximally exploited the humans as cattle. A quick death is much more convient than a lifetime of suffering.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m not going to argue which is worse, slavery or watching centuries of your entire culture destroyed in a day, along with every person in your life, before dying yourself. There are no winners in that argument.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      rome wasn’t even physically capable of enslaving that many people as the african slave trade did.

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          “they did it so we can too” is not the flex you think it is.

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That’s not what I was saying, and you damn well know it. I mentioned Rome, and you seized on that to make an illegitimate point, which I countered that Rome wasn’t the only civilization participating in slavery, and you took that as an opportunity to accuse me of being soft on slavery, which is really, really stupid.

            Highly disengenuous.

            • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              that’s exactly the point you are making though.

              “we can’t help africa because the romans did it too! and then everyone will want restitution!”