• SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Jesus fucking Christ guys. Regardless of your thoughts on age verification, hunting down someone just for complying with the (currently) rather inoffensive law is nuts.

    Posting his face here is absolutely going to get him doxxed, and going to cause someone to actually hunt him down and hurt him.

    Focus your anger on the people who actually passed and push for this law. Not the person who drew the short straw and had to implement it.

    • ThisIsABlandUsername@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      Why does the rest of the world have to comply with a handful of states laws? The US is not the center of the universe. If you people want to lick the boot and allow this, then by all means, create your own terrible versions and leave the rest of the world alone.

      • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s the Minnesota bill. The PR does not comply with that. You can read on how to the California law and NY and Colorado bills basically say to give the user a drop-down to select their birth date.

    • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Systemd is NOT an operating system provider, so they didn’t have to do absolutely anything.

      It was their choice to do what they did, not the law, especially since it won’t be active and enforceable before next year.

      Witch hunts are despicable indeed but lets not use that an an excuse to justify what they did.

    • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Not the person who drew the short straw and had to implement it.

      That’s the whole point, though, they don’t have to implement it. They’re under no obligation at all to do so. Try to rule Linux is illegal in California and watch Silicon Valley lobbyists damn near riot. They’re just giving in, but even just procrastination would be a ridiculously effective tactic.

    • stravanasu@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago
      1. He didn’t draw any straw. Nobody asked him to work on such an implementation (or maybe Meta did?).
      2. In fact, he appeared out of the blue to do this implementation. This was his very first pull request on the Systemd git.
      3. From the very start he received a huge amount of critical comments from the community on GitHub, while he was working on this. He neglected their criticism and plowed on.

      So he already had a warning that the majority of the community didn’t agree on what he was doing. Nobody asked him to. He chose to continue – he could have imagined the consequences.

      And the whole context on why and why now he did this is fishy.

    • Mactan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      it’s the public info on the accounts GitHub page it’s not like anybody really had to dig at all

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        There’s a huge difference between someone’s information being available on github and someone taking their picture and photoshopping it to look like a mugshot and writing a hit piece article that’s whipping people up into a lynch mob.

      • FatherPeanut@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Provided compliance is nuts, this man is a nutcase for complying. Sounds all good, but I dont believe being a nutcase warrants doxxing, verbal harassment, verbal threatening, and everything else that we’re seeing here.