While most hybrids are said to use one to two litres of fuel per 100km, a study claims they need six litres on average

Plug-in hybrid electric cars (PHEVs) use much more fuel on the road than officially stated by their manufacturers, a large-scale analysis of about a million vehicles of this type has shown.

The Fraunhofer Institute carried out what is thought to be the most comprehensive study of its kind to date, using the data transmitted wirelessly by PHEVs from a variety of manufacturers while they were on the road.

. . .

According to the study, the vehicles require on average six litres per 100km, or about 300%, more fuel to run than previously cited.

The scientists of the Fraunhofer Institute found that the main reason for the higher-than-stated fuel usage was due precisely to the fact that the PHEVs use two different modes, the electric engine and the combustion engine, switching between both. Until now it has been claimed by manufacturers that the vehicles used only a little or almost no fuel when in the electric mode. The studies showed that this was not in fact the case.

MBFC
Archive

  • Riverside@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    My 2006 diesel swallows 5.1L/100km, and it fits 7 people inside. New cars are mastodontic for no fucking reason

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Your diesel spews huge levels of dangerous pollutants far worse than more C02 from modern cars.

      • innermachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Diesel fumes get a really bad wrap because you can see black smoke on old or deleted rigs. In terms of work produced diesels had to beat and will never be replaced. Gas cars produce far more co and CO2 than any diesel, which is bad for environment. Diesels produce more NOx fumes and soot, which is worse for human health than it is for the environment. (Not that it isn’t bad for environment ) Overall diesels just more energy dense and you don’t need near as much to produce the same work as a gas job, and electric will NEVER replace diesel in container boats or semi trucks for goods transport. Do not mistake this as me saying we should all drive old diesel rigs! Just saying for moving large mass it’s pretty impossible to replace with today’s or tomorrow’s tech, and the idea that diesels are dirty and bad is simply wrong.

      • Riverside@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        My diesel is prominently used in inter-town roads, not in towns themselves, where such pollutants like nitrous oxides affect a much less significant amount of humans. Also, it cost me 2000€ + 1500€ in repairs.