Die Menschheit zerstört bewusst die eigenen Lebensgrundlagen.
Meine Beobachtung ist: Interessierte Kreise mit Bunkern z.B. auf Kauai/Hawaii und Einfluss auf Politik und Medien sagen sich, dass sie selbst das überleben werden und der Rest verrecken kann, solange es nur jetzt mehr Kohle gibt.
Selbst die Amis wollen mehrheitlich wohl stärkeren Umwelt- und Klimaschutz.
Hamburg, 12. November 2025 – Die Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Umfrage in den USA zeigen, dass die Mehrheit der US-Amerikaner:innen unabhängig von ihrer Parteizugehörigkeit stärkere Maßnahmen zum Schutz von Tieren und Umwelt unterstützt. Laut der repräsentativen Umfrage, die vom IFAW (International Fund for Animal Welfare) in Auftrag gegeben und von der Beekeeper Group durchgeführt wurde, wünschen sich die US-Bürger:innen, dass die Politik den Schutz wildlebender Tiere im In- und Ausland stärker in den Mittelpunkt ihrer Agenda stellt.
https://www.ifaw.org/de/press-releases/amerika-umfrage-tierschutz-umweltschutz
Donald Trumps Protektionismus wird von 55 Prozent der Befragten einer Umfrage positiv gesehen. Klimaschutz schließt sich aus ihrer Sicht damit aber nicht aus – es könnte sogar noch mehr getan werden.
Meine Beobachtung ist: Interessierte Kreise mit Bunkern z.B. auf Kauai/Hawaii und Einfluss auf Politik und Medien sagen sich, dass sie selbst das überleben werden und der Rest verrecken kann, solange es nur jetzt mehr Kohle gibt.
Und wie wollen die unter Steinzeitbedingungen dann klar kommen? Benzin wird irgendwann alle, Photovoltaik geht auch kaputt, Lebensmittel werden knapp.
Und wie wollen die unter Steinzeitbedingungen dann klar kommen?
Sie arbeiten scheinbar daran. Das muss ja nicht realistisch sein. Das sind auch nur Menschen wie Du und Ich. Nur ein bisschen bösartiger.
In his 2022 book ‘Survival of the Richest’ the theorist Douglas Rushkoff tells a story of being invited to talk to a group of “ultra-wealthy stakeholders”, who wanted his take on the potential future impact of technology.
But when he arrived at a top secret destination, it turned out that his audience was just five rich men – and they didn’t want to hear the talk he’d prepared. Instead, they peppered him with numerous questions about different technologies and situations, which quickly started to hone in on their core concern - which was how best to prepare for a doomsday scenario.
They wanted to know if it was better to get to New Zealand or Alaska, for example, whether he thought the risk of climate change was greater than the risk of biological warfare, and should a shelter have its own air supply, for example.
And all of these very wealthy people were very worried about what they called “the event” – which was an unnamed future disaster that would upend society. And they wanted to figure out how best to protect themselves, their families, and - of course - their assets and power.
[…]
Peter Thiel is perhaps the most interesting example – this is the multibillionaire early investor in PayPal. He’s worth around $17 billion today – he’s also a key backer of Donald Trump and JD Vance. But clearly he’s worried that they may not be able to make America great again, because he’s also developed a plan to escape to New Zealand in the event of a major disaster.
[…]
He told Sam Altman – the man behind ChatGPT – about his plan to escape on his private jet to New Zealand if there was a major natural disaster or political breakdown. His original intention seems to have been to retreat to a massive, bunker-like complex that he was to build on the remote part of its South Island. According to the planning application, this was to cover around 18 acres of land and include accommodation for Thiel and guests, as well as other management and infrastructure buildings, all of which would be embedded in the hills. But the plan was rejected because of the negative impact it would have on the landscape.
[…]
https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2025/0511/1512086-doomsday-prepping-rich/
Das Aufschlussreichste finde ich das Ende:
He said they were aware of the need to have armed guards to protect their bunkers –one had already lined up a dozen ex-Navy Seals to make their way to his compound once he gave the cue.
But they also wondered how they could keep the guards on their side – given that, in the event of a societal collapse, their money and even their cryptocurrency assets would all be pretty much worthless.
In order to stop the hired muscle simply dispatching their billionaire boss that they’ve been hired to protect, one of the rich men suggested they could keep the food behind combination locks as a disincentive for a revolt. Another suggested making their guards wear shock collars so they could be better controlled.
Rushkoff, though, suggested to them that - rather than focusing on weapons and access to food - the best approach to ensure they stayed on your side was to make the relationship a partnership rather than a transaction.
He suggested the billionaires work with their staff and start treating them like friends now in order to build loyalty and solidarity, and that would form the basis for a long term relationship where everyone looked out for each other.
Though, he said, that suggestion was met with a collective eye-roll from the billionaires.
Menschen wie Menschen zu behandeln oder sich selbst menschlich zu verhalten ist einfach überhaupt nicht vorstellbar für die.
Und wie kommt ihr damit so klar? Frag für einen Freund…
